From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from [10.3.1.93] (helo=sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1FZRES-000832-AG for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:33:56 -0700 Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZRES-0002LN-Bn for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:33:56 -0700 Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.36]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1FZREN-0000Vd-E7 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:33:56 -0700 From: Blaisorblade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] PATCH 0/4 - Time virtualization References: <200604131719.k3DHJcZG004674@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060426180110.GB8142@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20060426180110.GB8142@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604281333.41358.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:33:40 +0200 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jeff Dike , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 26 April 2006 20:01, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:25:00AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > In the case of migration the ugly case to properly handle is the > > monotonic timer. That needs an offset yet it is absolutely forbidden > > to provide that offset from the inside. So this is the one namespace > > that I think is inappropriate to use sys_unshare to create. > > We need a system call so that we can specify the minimum or the > > starting monotonic time base. > For migration, it looks like the container will have to specify the > time base at creation so that everything in it will have a consistent > view of time if they get moved around. > So, maybe it belongs in clone as a "backwards" flag similar to > CLONE_NEWNS. I must note that currently every (?) flag allowed for unshare is also allowed for clone, so you need to do that anyway. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel