Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] Promiscuous mode interface bug?

[Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>]

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:08:51PM -0700, Stephens, Allan wrote:
> Where I think my confusion is arising is in the details of how the
> filtering
> controlled by the promiscuous setting is actually done.  If a packet
> with 
> the "wrong" destination address arrives at an interface, who checks to
> see
> whether the interface has been configured as promiscuous and
> passes/discards it
> accordingly?  I have naively assumed that this was handled in hardware
> on the
> NIC card in a real system, but is it really done by software?  

Ah, a light goes on.  I believe that it is done on the card.

> What I seem to
> be
> observing in my UML testing is that *nobody* is doing this filtering,
> resulting in
> unwanted packets being handed to my protocol (which sits directly on top
> of the
> Ethernet driver).  

And since UML doesn't have "cards", it may be that the driver should do the
filtering at the bottom layer and it isn't.

				Jeff

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel