From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Syslets - Fix cachemiss_thread return value
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:27:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070607232733.GM17082@mami.zabbo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070531181923.GA9904@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:19:23PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> cachemiss_thread should explicitly return 0 or error instead of
> task_ret_reg(current) (which is -ENOSYS anyway) because
> async_thread_helper is careful to put the return value in eax anyway.
Here's the fix I came up with for this. Untested (my test boxes are
busy doing some aio+syslet perf runs :)). What do you guys think?
- z
- - -
async: return task_ret_reg() from async_cachemiss_loop()
When a thread blocks in __async_schedule() it finds a thread waiting in
async_cachemiss_loop() to return to userspace. The return value of
async_cachemiss_loop() is propagated to userspace as the return code of the
call which the thread blocked in.
Previously this return code was hard-coded to 0 and -1, which worked fine for
the first syslet syscall APIs. sys_io_submit() wants a different return call
convention when it uses syslets. So cachemiss_thread() was changed to return
task_ret_reg(), sys_io_submit() would set it to the value it wanted returned to
userspace.
But this, by itself, was buggy. The syslet syscall APIs didn't set
task_ret_reg() like sys_io_submit() did, so they got garbage returned. Both
Jeff Dike and Chris Mason saw this in testing, though I was lucky enough to
have my returned garbage pass the tests I initially tried. It also didn't
catch the other callers of async_cachemiss_loop() which would be returning to
userspace on behalf of calls which blocked in __async_schedule(). This would
be a problem, say, if people mixed sys_threadlet_on() and sys_io_submit() in
the same task.
So this patch fixes those up.
We always return task_ret_reg() from async_cachemiss_loop(). If we're
returning to the user's stack and IP instead of on behalf of a blocking call we
set task_ret_reg() to -1 and then return it.
__exec_atom() sets task_ret_reg() to NULL if there's a chance that it will
block while executing the syscall in the atom.
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
diff -r f0d8ee165e2e kernel/async.c
--- a/kernel/async.c Thu Jun 07 14:32:31 2007 -0700
+++ b/kernel/async.c Thu Jun 07 16:14:16 2007 -0700
@@ -206,6 +206,13 @@ static long __exec_atom(struct task_stru
if (unlikely(atom->nr >= atom->nr_syscalls))
return -ENOSYS;
+
+ /*
+ * If the syslet goes asynchronous then we want the cachemiss
+ * thread to return NULL to userspace on our behalf.
+ */
+ if (likely(t->async_ready))
+ task_ret_reg(t) = 0;
ret = atom->call_table[atom->nr](atom->args[0], atom->args[1],
atom->args[2], atom->args[3],
@@ -515,7 +522,22 @@ exec_atom(struct async_head *ah, struct
return last_uatom;
}
-
+/**
+ * async_cachemiss_loop - wait as a "cachemiss" thread
+ * @at: this thread's async_thread in its task_struct
+ * @ah: The async_head for this thread's group of threads
+ * @t: this thread's task_struct
+ *
+ * Sleep as a ready async "cachemiss" thread. If another thread in our
+ * async_head blocks then __async_schedule may block that thread and transfer
+ * its userspace over to us to return in to.
+ *
+ * Before threads get to __async_schedule() they set task_ret_reg() to the
+ * value that should be returned to userspace if they block. We return it so
+ * that our caller can return it to userspace, either through the usual syscall
+ * return path or through the helper which cachemiss_thread() returns to after
+ * being created.
+ */
long async_cachemiss_loop(struct async_thread *at, struct async_head *ah,
struct task_struct *t)
{
@@ -542,10 +564,13 @@ long async_cachemiss_loop(struct async_t
*/
set_task_stack_reg(t, at->user_stack);
task_ip_reg(t) = at->user_ip;
-
- return -1;
- }
- return 0;
+ /*
+ * We're not returning on behalf of some call, communicate
+ * that.
+ */
+ task_ret_reg(t) = -1;
+ }
+ return task_ret_reg(t);
}
struct cachemiss_args {
@@ -559,14 +584,6 @@ struct cachemiss_args {
* first time: initialize, pick up the user stack/IP addresses from
* the head and then execute the cachemiss loop. If the cachemiss
* loop returns then we return back to user-space.
- *
- * Our return code overwrites the task_ret_reg() in ptregs in the assembly
- * stub which execution returns to before returning to userspace. We may
- * be returning to userspace on behalf of an interrupted call which might
- * want us to return something specific to user space. We return
- * task_ret_reg() from this function so that the tasks we're returning
- * on behalf of can use it to pass return codes to userspace. Perhaps
- * we shouldn't have the asm stub overwrite task_ret_reg() instead..
*/
static long cachemiss_thread(void *data)
{
@@ -606,8 +623,7 @@ static long cachemiss_thread(void *data)
}
complete(&ah->start_done);
- async_cachemiss_loop(at, ah, t);
- return task_ret_reg(t);
+ return async_cachemiss_loop(at, ah, t);
}
/**
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-07 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 18:19 [uml-devel] [PATCH] Syslets - Fix cachemiss_thread return value Jeff Dike
2007-05-31 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 22:07 ` Zach Brown
2007-05-31 23:39 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-01 0:00 ` Zach Brown
2007-06-07 23:27 ` Zach Brown [this message]
2007-06-08 16:10 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-08 16:26 ` Zach Brown
2007-06-08 16:33 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-08 16:46 ` Zach Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070607232733.GM17082@mami.zabbo.net \
--to=zach.brown@oracle.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox