From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: John Reiser <jreiser@BitWagon.com>
Cc: uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] should there be os_clone() analogous to os_getpid() ?
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:10:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071209151054.GA4368@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <475B6E19.6040200@BitWagon.com>
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:24:57PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>In source file arch/um/os-Linux/process.c there is a warning:
>-----
>/* Don't use the glibc version, which caches the result in TLS. It misses some
> * syscalls, and also breaks with clone(), which does not unshare the TLS.
> */
>
>int os_getpid(void)
AFAIK, there are two reasons that we make sure we call the system call
getpid -
when we're testing ptrace, we want getpid to result in exactly
one system call
there was a brief bug in libc where getpid returned the wrong
answer due to caching across a clone
This bug did get into the wild, and people did try to run UML on such
systems, so that's why the code is careful about making the system call.
> I see no os_clone(), yet the glibc clone() does the same caching of pid in
> ThreadLocalStorage [TLS], and the TLS still may be shared. If nobody reads
> glibc's shared TLS slot for PID then an actual bug will be avoided. However,
> it is unsafe to leave such a tempting pitfall.
What's the actual bug, exactly? As long as libc's getpid gives us the
right answer, we're happy.
> Also, if you are ptrace()ing
> through a glibc clone(), then in many cases you will see syscall(__NR_getpid)
> *from glibc* immediately following! There is an "extra" getpid()
> that the tracking logic might not expect.
Where do we care about how clone translates into a system call?
> arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c
> arch/um/kernel/tt/tracer.c
> arch/um/os/tt.c
> arch/um/os/start_up.c
> arch/um/os/skas/process.c
These guys all just want a new process - they don't care how it
happens.
Is something in here causing valgrind some trouble?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-09 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-09 4:24 [uml-devel] should there be os_clone() analogous to os_getpid() ? John Reiser
2007-12-09 15:10 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-12-09 20:58 ` John Reiser
2007-12-10 17:09 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071209151054.GA4368@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=jreiser@BitWagon.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox