From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JbJOB-0004rh-H7 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:44:47 -0700 Received: from [198.99.130.12] (helo=saraswathi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1JbJOA-0007en-2w for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:44:47 -0700 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:44:34 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20080317174434.GB10838@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Use newer, non-deprecated __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED macro. List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:57:29PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > not compile tested, it seems pretty straightforward. Looks good to me... Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel