From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: "Bram Matthys (Syzop)" <syzop@vulnscan.org>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] umls unresponsive & consuming 100% cpu time
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:40:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080513154033.GA8867@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48255FC4.4040805@vulnscan.org>
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:41:40AM +0200, Bram Matthys (Syzop) wrote:
> I also saw this on my console (which does not react either btw), not sure
> when it appeared.. at or very short after/before the time setting:
> Stub registers -
> ~ 0 - 621a
> ~ 1 - 13
> ~ 2 - 621a
> ~ 3 - 6215
> ~ 4 - 8
> ~ 5 - bfae182c
> ~ 6 - 0
> ~ 7 - 7b
> ~ 8 - 7b
> ~ 9 - 0
> ~ 10 - 0
> ~ 11 - ffffffff
> ~ 12 - 1000be
> ~ 13 - 73
> ~ 14 - 200246
> ~ 15 - bfae1810
> ~ 16 - 7b
> wait_stub_done : failed to wait for SIGTRAP, pid = 26141, n = 26141, errno =
> 0, status = 0x1c7f
For this one, try this patch:
Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c 2008-04-14 10:44:33.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c 2008-05-13 11:37:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
* Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
* SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
*/
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))
/* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
#define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)
I doubt it will fix the time problem. I'm going to chase vincent's
problem on the assusmption that you're seeing the same thing. When I
figure that out, we'll see how true that is.
> The old 2.6.20.1 uml's react fine when setting time backwards, btw (well..
> within reasonable limits)
UML got its timekeeping redone as part of the tickless work and I'm
still shaking out bugs...
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 14:00 [uml-devel] umls unresponsive & consuming 100% cpu time Bram Matthys (Syzop)
2008-05-07 20:23 ` Nix
2008-05-08 10:02 ` [SPAM] " Bram Matthys (Syzop)
2008-05-09 15:45 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-10 8:41 ` [SPAM] " Bram Matthys (Syzop)
2008-05-13 15:40 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2008-05-14 8:41 ` Sakari Ailus
2008-05-19 16:16 ` Jeff Dike
2008-05-31 9:16 ` Bram Matthys (Syzop)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080513154033.GA8867@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=syzop@vulnscan.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox