From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDMTd-0003FF-P5 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:43:41 -0700 Received: from smtp4.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.38]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1KDMTc-0003Es-Ba for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:43:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:43:24 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk Message-ID: <20080630164324.GA1536@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> References: <1214488251-20927-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com> <20080627162645.GC8381@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <7225594ED4A1304C9E43D030A886D221050BE1@daytona.int.panasas.com> <48673A9B.8050907@panasas.com> <20080630162201.GC6643@c2.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080630162201.GC6643@c2.user-mode-linux.org> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] fix extern inline errors with gcc 4.3.0 List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jeff Dike Cc: Benny Halevy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:22:01PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:32:43AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > > Note that the crash happened with gcc 4.1.2 and it will get the > > -fno-unit-at-a-time flag with the proposed patch. > > > > That said, this option or the lack of it ought not to cause any > > runtime crashes. If it does, I'd feel much more comfortable to know > > exactly what the root cause is before deciding to use the flag to > > workaround^hide it. > > I agree. > > The constraints on [no-]unit-at-a-time that I see are: >... > x86_64 uses unit-at-a-time always >... The only gcc versions that ever supported unit-at-a-time without enabling it by default was some patched gcc 3.3 that included a backport of unit-at-a-time to gcc 3.3. Just as a note that I doubt this matters in practice today. > Jeff cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel