From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by 335xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LOh5O-0004s2-MH for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:29:46 +0000 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by 72vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1LOh5F-00013K-Pn for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:29:46 +0000 From: Rob Landley Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:29:30 -0600 References: <20090115194033.GA10926@hack.private> <200901170328.15178.rob@landley.net> <20090118083237.GA3292@hack.private> In-Reply-To: <20090118083237.GA3292@hack.private> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901181729.31682.rob@landley.net> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [Patch] uml: fix a link error List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Am=E9rico_Wang?= Cc: Andrew Morton , jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 18 January 2009 02:32:37 Am=E9rico Wang wrote: > >The result panics (twice) and exits, instead of giving me a shell prompt. > >Built and run on stock Ubuntu 8.10. (I posted about it on tuesday, but > > nobody replied...) > > Hi, Rob. > > I tried what you said, it works very fine here, on my Fedora 10. > Could you please tell us which kernel your host is using? Ubuntu 8.10 stock kernel, calls itself "2.6.27-9-generic". > and the guest? Checking tuesday's bug report, it said: > Linux version 2.6.28 (landley@driftwood) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Ubuntu = > 4.3.2-1ubuntu11) ) #6 Tue Jan 13 01:54:34 CST 2009 It's the vanilla tarball (albeit extracted from source control according to = the v2.6.28 tag rather than downloaded). Possibly a gcc 4.3 issue? Rob ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel