From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:07:22 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot Message-Id: <20090626110722.7ca2e8c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <4A432DD4.3010905@panasas.com> References: <20090620005524.25582.69677.stgit@menage.mtv.corp.google.com> <4A3F4448.30502@panasas.com> <20090625135901.a028512d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A432DD4.3010905@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__26_Jun_2009_11_07_22_+1000_+N+U/eWqXUq/h3ys" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Paul Menage , Andrew Morton , jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Rusty Russell List-ID: --Signature=_Fri__26_Jun_2009_11_07_22_+1000_+N+U/eWqXUq/h3ys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Boaz, On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:57:08 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrot= e: > > On 06/25/2009 06:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > I applied the following patch to yesterday's linux-next and the i386 uml > > defconfig build succeeded. >=20 > Stephan Hi,=20 ^ Stephen :-) > Does this means that there will be a UML build every linux-next now? Yes, I will also see if the x86_64 UML will build. I know the PPC one won't (does anyone care?). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__26_Jun_2009_11_07_22_+1000_+N+U/eWqXUq/h3ys Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpEH0oACgkQjjKRsyhoI8yFagCgvy78dnYVEHWwv1bBsSkYJ0gc 9/oAoKlewV4ngE2itq7NE2FPMPMRi8uI =jXJo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__26_Jun_2009_11_07_22_+1000_+N+U/eWqXUq/h3ys--