linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@google.com,
	mcgrof@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: brakmo@fb.com, richard@nod.at, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Tim.Bird@sony.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	julia.lawall@lip6.fr, Felix Guo <felixguoxiuping@gmail.com>,
	joel@jms.id.au, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	khilman@baylibre.com, joe@perches.com, jdike@addtoit.com,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RFC v1 19/31] kunit: mock: implemented nice, strict and naggy mock distinctions
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:51:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181016235120.138227-20-brendanhiggins@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016235120.138227-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>

Nice mocks only fail when there is an expectation on a method, but none
match a given call. Strict mocks only pass when there is a matching
expectation for every call. Naggy mocks have the same pass/fail behavior
as nice, but report a warning in any case a strict mock would fail.

Signed-off-by: Felix Guo <felixguoxiuping@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
---
 include/kunit/mock.h     |  63 +++++++++++++
 kunit/mock-test.c        | 192 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kunit/mock.c             |  10 +-
 kunit/test-stream-test.c |   6 +-
 4 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/mock.h b/include/kunit/mock.h
index 4f85b39d628d0..8d155b27a257a 100644
--- a/include/kunit/mock.h
+++ b/include/kunit/mock.h
@@ -95,10 +95,17 @@ struct mock_method {
 	struct list_head expectations;
 };
 
+enum mock_type {
+	MOCK_TYPE_NICE,
+	MOCK_TYPE_NAGGY,
+	MOCK_TYPE_STRICT
+};
+
 struct mock {
 	struct test_post_condition parent;
 	struct test *test;
 	struct list_head methods;
+	enum mock_type type;
 	/* TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): add locking to do_expect. */
 	const void *(*do_expect)(struct mock *mock,
 				 const char *method_name,
@@ -108,6 +115,8 @@ struct mock {
 				 int len);
 };
 
+#define DEFAULT_MOCK_TYPE MOCK_TYPE_NAGGY
+
 void mock_init_ctrl(struct test *test, struct mock *mock);
 
 void mock_validate_expectations(struct mock *mock);
@@ -137,6 +146,60 @@ void mock_unregister_formatter(struct mock_param_formatter *formatter);
 
 #define MOCK(name) name##_mock
 
+/**
+ * STRICT_MOCK() - sets the mock to be strict and returns the mock
+ * @mock: the mock
+ *
+ * For an example, see ``The Nice, the Strict, and the Naggy`` under
+ * ``Using KUnit``.
+ */
+#define STRICT_MOCK(mock) \
+({ \
+	mock_get_ctrl(mock)->type = MOCK_TYPE_STRICT; \
+	mock; \
+})
+
+static inline bool is_strict_mock(struct mock *mock)
+{
+	return mock->type == MOCK_TYPE_STRICT;
+}
+
+/**
+ * NICE_MOCK() - sets the mock to be nice and returns the mock
+ * @mock: the mock
+ *
+ * For an example, see ``The Nice, the Strict, and the Naggy`` under
+ * ``Using KUnit``.
+ */
+#define NICE_MOCK(mock) \
+({ \
+	mock_get_ctrl(mock)->type = MOCK_TYPE_NICE; \
+	mock; \
+})
+
+static inline bool is_nice_mock(struct mock *mock)
+{
+	return mock->type == MOCK_TYPE_NICE;
+}
+
+/**
+ * NAGGY_MOCK() - sets the mock to be naggy and returns the mock
+ * @mock: the mock
+ *
+ * For an example, see ``The Nice, the Strict, and the Naggy`` under
+ * ``Using KUnit``.
+ */
+#define NAGGY_MOCK(mock) \
+({ \
+	mock_get_ctrl(mock)->type = MOCK_TYPE_NAGGY; \
+	mock; \
+})
+
+static inline bool is_naggy_mock(struct mock *mock)
+{
+	return mock->type == MOCK_TYPE_NAGGY;
+}
+
 /**
  * TEST_EXPECT_CALL() - Declares a *call expectation* on a mock function.
  * @expectation_call: a mocked method or function with parameters replaced with
diff --git a/kunit/mock-test.c b/kunit/mock-test.c
index 77b16ad754424..675387743ada4 100644
--- a/kunit/mock-test.c
+++ b/kunit/mock-test.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void mock_test_failed_expect_call_fails_test(struct test *test)
 static void mock_test_do_expect_default_return(struct test *test)
 {
 	struct mock_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
-	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = NICE_MOCK(ctx->mock_test);
 	struct test *trgt = mock_get_trgt(mock_test);
 	struct mock *mock = ctx->mock;
 	int param0 = 5, param1 = -5;
@@ -187,6 +187,49 @@ static void mock_test_do_expect_default_return(struct test *test)
 	TEST_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, expectation->times_called);
 }
 
+/**
+ * DOC: Testing the failure condition of different mock types.
+ *
+ * The following tests will test the behaviour of expectations under different
+ * conditions. For example, what happens when an expectation:
+ * - is not satisfied at the end of the test
+ * - is fulfilled but the expected function is called again
+ * - a function is called without expectations set on it
+ *
+ * For each of these conditions, there may be variations between the different
+ * types of mocks: nice mocks, naggy mocks (the default) and strict mocks.
+ *
+ * More information about these mocks can be found in the kernel documentation
+ * under Documentation/test/api/class-and-function-mocking
+ */
+
+/* Method called on strict mock with no expectations will fail */
+static void mock_test_strict_no_expectations_will_fail(struct test *test)
+{
+	struct mock_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct test *trgt = mock_get_trgt(mock_test);
+	struct mock *mock = ctx->mock;
+	int param0 = 5, param1 = -5;
+	static const char * const two_param_types[] = {"int", "int"};
+	const void *two_params[] = {&param0, &param1};
+	struct mock_expectation *expectation;
+
+	mock->type = MOCK_TYPE_STRICT;
+
+	mock_set_default_action(mock,
+				"test_printk",
+				test_printk,
+				test_int_return(trgt, -4));
+
+	expectation = TEST_EXPECT_CALL(fail(mock_get_ctrl(mock_test),
+					    test_any(test)));
+
+	mock->do_expect(mock, "test_printk", test_printk, two_param_types,
+		two_params, ARRAY_SIZE(two_params));
+	mock_validate_expectations(mock);
+}
+
 /*
  * Method called on naggy mock with no expectations will not fail, but will show
  * a warning message
@@ -202,6 +245,8 @@ static void mock_test_naggy_no_expectations_no_fail(struct test *test)
 	const void *two_params[] = {&param0, &param1};
 	struct mock_expectation *expectation;
 
+	mock->type = MOCK_TYPE_NAGGY;
+
 	mock_set_default_action(mock,
 				"test_printk",
 				test_printk,
@@ -229,6 +274,93 @@ static void mock_test_naggy_no_expectations_no_fail(struct test *test)
 	mock_validate_expectations(mock);
 }
 
+/* Method called on nice mock with no expectations will do nothing. */
+static void mock_test_nice_no_expectations_do_nothing(struct test *test)
+{
+	struct mock_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct test *trgt = mock_get_trgt(mock_test);
+	struct mock *mock = ctx->mock;
+	int param0 = 5, param1 = -5;
+	static const char * const two_param_types[] = {"int", "int"};
+	const void *two_params[] = {&param0, &param1};
+	struct mock_expectation *expectation;
+
+	mock->type = MOCK_TYPE_NICE;
+
+	mock_set_default_action(mock,
+				"test_printk",
+				test_printk,
+				test_int_return(trgt, -4));
+
+	expectation = TEST_EXPECT_CALL(fail(mock_get_ctrl(mock_test),
+					    test_any(test)));
+	expectation->min_calls_expected = 0;
+	expectation->max_calls_expected = 0;
+
+	expectation = TEST_EXPECT_CALL(mock_vprintk(mock_get_ctrl(mock_test),
+						    test_any(test),
+						    test_any(test)));
+	expectation->min_calls_expected = 0;
+	expectation->max_calls_expected = 0;
+
+	mock->do_expect(mock,
+			"test_printk",
+			test_printk,
+			two_param_types,
+			two_params,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(two_params));
+	mock_validate_expectations(mock);
+}
+
+/* Test that method called on a mock (of any type) with no matching expectations
+ * will fail test and print all the tried expectations.
+ */
+static void
+run_method_called_but_no_matching_expectation_test(struct test *test,
+						   enum mock_type mock_type)
+{
+	struct mock_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct test *trgt = mock_get_trgt(mock_test);
+	struct mock *mock = ctx->mock;
+	int param0 = 5, param1 = -5;
+	static const char * const two_param_types[] = {"int", "int"};
+	const void *two_params[] = {&param0, &param1};
+	struct mock_expectation *handle;
+	struct mock_param_matcher *two_matchers[] = {
+		test_int_eq(trgt, 100),
+		test_int_eq(trgt, 100)
+	};
+	mock_add_matcher(mock, "test_printk", test_printk, two_matchers,
+		ARRAY_SIZE(two_matchers));
+	handle = TEST_EXPECT_CALL(fail(mock_get_ctrl(mock_test),
+				       test_any(test)));
+
+	mock->type = mock_type;
+
+	mock->do_expect(mock, "test_printk", test_printk, two_param_types,
+		two_params, ARRAY_SIZE(two_params));
+}
+
+static void mock_test_naggy_no_matching_expectations_fail(struct test *test)
+{
+	run_method_called_but_no_matching_expectation_test(test,
+							   MOCK_TYPE_NAGGY);
+}
+
+static void mock_test_strict_no_matching_expectations_fail(struct test *test)
+{
+	run_method_called_but_no_matching_expectation_test(test,
+							   MOCK_TYPE_STRICT);
+}
+
+static void mock_test_nice_no_matching_expectations_fail(struct test *test)
+{
+	run_method_called_but_no_matching_expectation_test(test,
+							   MOCK_TYPE_NICE);
+}
+
 static void mock_test_mock_validate_expectations(struct test *test)
 {
 	struct mock_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
@@ -257,6 +389,58 @@ static void mock_test_mock_validate_expectations(struct test *test)
 	mock_validate_expectations(mock);
 }
 
+static void mock_test_validate_clears_expectations(struct test *test)
+{
+	struct mock_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct test *trgt = mock_get_trgt(mock_test);
+	struct mock *mock = ctx->mock;
+	struct mock_param_matcher *matchers[] = {
+		test_int_eq(trgt, 5),
+		test_int_eq(trgt, -4)
+	};
+	int param0 = 5, param1 = -4;
+	static const char * const two_param_types[] = {"int", "int"};
+	const void *two_params[] = {&param0, &param1};
+
+	struct mock_expectation *expectation;
+
+	mock->type = MOCK_TYPE_STRICT;
+
+	/* If all goes well, the mock_test should not fail. */
+	expectation = TEST_EXPECT_CALL(fail(mock_get_ctrl(mock_test),
+					    test_any(test)));
+	expectation->min_calls_expected = 0;
+	expectation->max_calls_expected = 0;
+
+	/* Add an arbitrary matcher for 0 calls */
+	expectation = mock_add_matcher(mock, "test_printk", test_printk,
+		matchers, ARRAY_SIZE(matchers));
+	expectation->times_called = 0;
+	expectation->min_calls_expected = 0;
+	expectation->max_calls_expected = 0;
+
+	/* Should have 0 calls and should clear the previous expectation */
+	mock_validate_expectations(mock);
+
+	/* Add a new matcher for 1 call */
+	expectation = mock_add_matcher(mock, "test_printk", test_printk,
+		matchers, ARRAY_SIZE(matchers));
+	expectation->times_called = 0;
+	expectation->min_calls_expected = 1;
+	expectation->max_calls_expected = 1;
+
+	/* Satisfy previous matcher */
+	mock->do_expect(mock, "test_printk", test_printk, two_param_types,
+		two_params, ARRAY_SIZE(two_params));
+
+	/*
+	 * Validate previous satisfy; if we didn't clear the previous
+	 * expectation, it would fail the mock_test.
+	 */
+	mock_validate_expectations(mock);
+}
+
 void *do_mocked_fail(struct mock_action *this, const void **params, int len)
 {
 	static const int ret;
@@ -306,7 +490,13 @@ static struct test_case mock_test_cases[] = {
 	TEST_CASE(mock_test_failed_expect_call_fails_test),
 	TEST_CASE(mock_test_do_expect_default_return),
 	TEST_CASE(mock_test_mock_validate_expectations),
+	TEST_CASE(mock_test_strict_no_expectations_will_fail),
 	TEST_CASE(mock_test_naggy_no_expectations_no_fail),
+	TEST_CASE(mock_test_nice_no_expectations_do_nothing),
+	TEST_CASE(mock_test_strict_no_matching_expectations_fail),
+	TEST_CASE(mock_test_naggy_no_matching_expectations_fail),
+	TEST_CASE(mock_test_nice_no_matching_expectations_fail),
+	TEST_CASE(mock_test_validate_clears_expectations),
 	{},
 };
 
diff --git a/kunit/mock.c b/kunit/mock.c
index 9be6b2d3621c4..314cebb54e236 100644
--- a/kunit/mock.c
+++ b/kunit/mock.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ void mock_init_ctrl(struct test *test, struct mock *mock)
 	mock->test = test;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mock->methods);
 	mock->do_expect = mock_do_expect;
+	mock->type = DEFAULT_MOCK_TYPE;
 	mock->parent.validate = mock_validate_wrapper;
 	list_add_tail(&mock->parent.node, &test->post_conditions);
 }
@@ -316,7 +317,12 @@ static struct mock_expectation *mock_apply_expectations(
 		mock_add_method_expectation_error(test, stream,
 			"Method was called with no expectations declared: ",
 			mock, method, type_names, params, len);
-		stream->commit(stream);
+		if (is_strict_mock(mock))
+			test->fail(test, stream);
+		else if (is_naggy_mock(mock))
+			stream->commit(stream);
+		else
+			stream->clear(stream);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -346,7 +352,7 @@ static struct mock_expectation *mock_apply_expectations(
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (expectations_all_saturated) {
+	if (expectations_all_saturated && !is_nice_mock(mock)) {
 		mock_add_method_expectation_error(test, stream,
 			"Method was called with fully saturated expectations: ",
 			mock, method, type_names, params, len);
diff --git a/kunit/test-stream-test.c b/kunit/test-stream-test.c
index b335e09805a0f..738a2692f7ba4 100644
--- a/kunit/test-stream-test.c
+++ b/kunit/test-stream-test.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct test_stream_test_context {
 static void test_stream_test_add(struct test *test)
 {
 	struct test_stream_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
-	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = NICE_MOCK(ctx->mock_test);
 	struct test_stream *stream = ctx->stream;
 
 	stream->add(stream, "Foo");
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static void test_stream_test_add(struct test *test)
 static void test_stream_test_append(struct test *test)
 {
 	struct test_stream_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
-	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = NICE_MOCK(ctx->mock_test);
 	struct test_stream *stream = ctx->stream;
 	struct test_stream *other_stream;
 
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void test_stream_test_append(struct test *test)
 static void test_stream_error_message_when_no_level_set(struct test *test)
 {
 	struct test_stream_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
-	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = ctx->mock_test;
+	struct MOCK(test) *mock_test = NICE_MOCK(ctx->mock_test);
 	struct test_stream *stream = ctx->stream;
 	struct test_stream *other_stream;
 
-- 
2.19.1.331.ge82ca0e54c-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-16 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-16 23:50 [RFC v1 00/31] kunit: Introducing KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 01/31] kunit: test: added string_stream a std::stream like string builder Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 02/31] kunit: test: adds KUnit test runner core Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 03/31] kunit: test: added test resource management API Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 04/31] kunit: test: added test_stream a std::stream like logger Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 05/31] kunit: test: added the concept of expectations Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 06/31] arch: um: enabled running kunit from User Mode Linux Brendan Higgins
2018-10-17 15:29   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-10-17 17:43     ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-17 17:52     ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-17 21:09       ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-17 21:18         ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-17 22:45           ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 07/31] kunit: test: added initial tests Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 08/31] arch: um: added shim to trap to allow installing a fault catcher for tests Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 09/31] kunit: test: added the concept of assertions Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:50 ` [RFC v1 10/31] kunit: test: added concept of initcalls Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 11/31] kunit: test: added concept of post conditions Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 12/31] checkpatch: added support for struct MOCK(foo) syntax Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:59   ` Joe Perches
2018-10-17  0:03     ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 13/31] kunit: mock: added parameter list minipulation macros Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 14/31] kunit: mock: added internal mock infrastructure Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 15/31] kunit: mock: added basic matchers and actions Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 16/31] kunit: mock: added class mocking support Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 17/31] kunit: mock: added struct param matcher Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 18/31] kunit: mock: added parameter formatters Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` Brendan Higgins [this message]
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 20/31] kunit: mock: add ability to mock functions with void context Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 21/31] kunit: mock: added support for arbitrary function mocking Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 22/31] kunit: mock: add the concept of spyable functions Brendan Higgins
2018-10-17 22:46   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18  1:32     ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 23/31] kunit: mock: add parameter capturers Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 24/31] kunit: improved sigsegv stack trace printing Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 25/31] kunit: added concept of platform mocking Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 26/31] arch: um: added stubs for mock iomem for KUnit Brendan Higgins
2018-10-17 22:28   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18  1:14     ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 27/31] Documentation: kunit: adds complete documentation " Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 28/31] kunit: added Python libraries for handing KUnit config and kernel Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 29/31] kunit: added KUnit wrapper script and simple output parser Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 30/31] kunit.py: improved output from python wrapper Brendan Higgins
2018-10-16 23:51 ` [RFC v1 31/31] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework Brendan Higgins
2018-10-17  9:08 ` [RFC v1 00/31] kunit: Introducing KUnit, the Linux kernel " Daniel Vetter
2018-10-17 17:49 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-17 22:22   ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-17 20:43 ` Rob Herring
2018-10-17 23:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-10-18  2:05   ` Brendan Higgins
2018-10-18  3:55 ` Dan Williams
2018-10-19  6:27   ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181016235120.138227-20-brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --to=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
    --cc=brakmo@fb.com \
    --cc=felixguoxiuping@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).