From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11] helo=outgoing.mit.edu) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hOZcc-0004cw-SR for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 03:21:28 +0000 Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 23:20:17 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Message-ID: <20190509032017.GA29703@mit.edu> References: <20190501230126.229218-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <54940124-50df-16ec-1a32-ad794ee05da7@gmail.com> <20190507080119.GB28121@kroah.com> <20190509015856.GB7031@mit.edu> <580e092f-fa4e-eedc-9e9a-a57dd085f0a6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <580e092f-fa4e-eedc-9e9a-a57dd085f0a6@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Frank Rowand Cc: pmladek@suse.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, amir73il@gmail.com, Brendan Higgins , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, wfg@linux.intel.com, joel@jms.id.au, rientjes@google.com, jdike@addtoit.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, dan.j.williams@intel.com, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, richard@nod.at, sboyd@kernel.org, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, keescook@google.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:13:59PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > > If you want to use vice grips as a hammer, screwdriver, monkey wrench, > > etc. there's nothing stopping you from doing that. But it's not fair > > to object to other people who might want to use better tools. > > > > The reality is that we have a lot of testing tools. It's not just > > kselftests. There is xfstests for file system code, blktests for > > block layer tests, etc. We use the right tool for the right job. > > More specious arguments. Well, *I* don't think they are specious; so I think we're going to have to agree to disagree. Cheers, - Ted _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um