From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 20:50:30 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] mtd: rawnand: add unspecified HAS_IOMEM dependency Message-ID: <20200130205030.0f58cb02@xps13> In-Reply-To: <20200125162803.5a2375d7@xps13> References: <20191211192742.95699-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20191211192742.95699-3-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20200109162303.35f4f0a3@xps13> <20200125162803.5a2375d7@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brendan Higgins Cc: Jeff Dike , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Vignesh Raghavendra , Boris Brezillon , Piotr Sroka , linux-um , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Gow , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-ID: Hello, Miquel Raynal wrote on Sat, 25 Jan 2020 16:28:03 +0100: > Hi Brendan, > > Brendan Higgins wrote on Fri, 24 Jan 2020 > 18:12:12 -0800: > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 7:23 AM Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > > > Hi Brendan, > > > > > > Brendan Higgins wrote on Wed, 11 Dec 2019 > > > 11:27:37 -0800: > > > > > > > Currently CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CADENCE implicitly depends on > > > > CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM=y; consequently, on architectures without IOMEM we get > > > > the following build error: > > > > > > > > ld: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cadence-nand-controller.o: in function `cadence_nand_dt_probe.cold.31': > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cadence-nand-controller.c:2969: undefined reference to `devm_platform_ioremap_resource' > > > > ld: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cadence-nand-controller.c:2977: undefined reference to `devm_ioremap_resource' > > > > > > > > Fix the build error by adding the unspecified dependency. > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Brendan Higgins > > > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins > > > > --- > > > > > > Sorry for the delay. > > > > > > Acked-by: Miquel Raynal > > > > It looks like my change has not been applied to nand/next; is this the > > branch it should be applied to? I have also verified that this patch > > isn't in linux-next as of Jan 24th. > > > > Is mtd/linux the correct tree for this? Or do I need to reach out to > > someone else? > > When I sent my Acked-by I supposed someone else would pick the patch, > but there is actually no dependency with all the other patches so I > don't know why I did it... Sorry about that. I'll take it anyway in my > PR for 5.6. It is applied on top of mtd/next since a few days, it will be part of the 5.6 PR. Sorry for the delay. Thanks, Miquèl