From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Allen Pais Subject: [PATCH] char: ipmi: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:45:57 +0530 Message-Id: <20200817091617.28119-3-allen.cryptic@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200817091617.28119-1-allen.cryptic@gmail.com> References: <20200817091617.28119-1-allen.cryptic@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, 3chas3@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, sre@kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, kys@microsoft.com, deller@gmx.de, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, maximlevitsky@gmail.com, oakad@yahoo.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, mporter@kernel.crashing.org, alex.bou9@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, martyn@welchs.me.uk, manohar.vanga@gmail.com, mitch@sfgoth.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: keescook@chromium.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Allen Pais , Romain Perier List-ID: From: Allen Pais In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier Signed-off-by: Allen Pais --- drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c index 737c0b6b24ea..e1814b6a1225 100644 --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static struct ipmi_recv_msg *ipmi_alloc_recv_msg(void); static int ipmi_init_msghandler(void); -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long); +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t); static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf); static void need_waiter(struct ipmi_smi *intf); static int handle_one_recv_msg(struct ipmi_smi *intf, @@ -3430,9 +3430,8 @@ int ipmi_add_smi(struct module *owner, intf->curr_seq = 0; spin_lock_init(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs); - tasklet_init(&intf->recv_tasklet, - smi_recv_tasklet, - (unsigned long) intf); + tasklet_setup(&intf->recv_tasklet, + smi_recv_tasklet); atomic_set(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver, 0); spin_lock_init(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->xmit_msgs); @@ -4467,10 +4466,10 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf) } } -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long val) +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t) { unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */ - struct ipmi_smi *intf = (struct ipmi_smi *) val; + struct ipmi_smi *intf = from_tasklet(intf, t, recv_tasklet); int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion; struct ipmi_smi_msg *newmsg = NULL; @@ -4542,7 +4541,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags); if (run_to_completion) - smi_recv_tasklet((unsigned long) intf); + smi_recv_tasklet(&intf->recv_tasklet); else tasklet_schedule(&intf->recv_tasklet); } -- 2.17.1