From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:32:16 -0500 From: Corey Minyard Subject: Re: [PATCH] char: ipmi: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API Message-ID: <20200818113216.GD2842@minyard.net> References: <20200817091617.28119-1-allen.cryptic@gmail.com> <20200817091617.28119-3-allen.cryptic@gmail.com> <20200817121514.GE2865@minyard.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: minyard@acm.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Allen Cc: Ulf Hansson , linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, manohar.vanga@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, kys@microsoft.com, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, maximlevitsky@gmail.com, richard@nod.at, deller@gmx.de, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, 3chas3@gmail.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jakub Kicinski , mporter@kernel.crashing.org, jdike@addtoit.com, Kees Cook , oakad@yahoo.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, mitch@sfgoth.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, martyn@welchs.me.uk, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, sre@kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, alex.bou9@gmail.com, Allen Pais , stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, daniel@ffwll.ch, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, Romain Perier , shawnguo@kernel.org, David Miller On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:46:23PM +0530, Allen wrote: > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier > > > Signed-off-by: Allen Pais > > > > This looks good to me. > > > > Reviewed-by: Corey Minyard > > > > Are you planning to push this, or do you want me to take it? If you > > want me to take it, what is the urgency? > > Thanks. Well, not hurry, as long as it goes into 5.9 with all other > changes. Ok, this is queued in my for-next branch. -corey > > > > > > -corey > > > > > --- > > > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 13 ++++++------- > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c > > > index 737c0b6b24ea..e1814b6a1225 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c > > > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c > > > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ > > > > > > static struct ipmi_recv_msg *ipmi_alloc_recv_msg(void); > > > static int ipmi_init_msghandler(void); > > > -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long); > > > +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t); > > > static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf); > > > static void need_waiter(struct ipmi_smi *intf); > > > static int handle_one_recv_msg(struct ipmi_smi *intf, > > > @@ -3430,9 +3430,8 @@ int ipmi_add_smi(struct module *owner, > > > intf->curr_seq = 0; > > > spin_lock_init(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock); > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs); > > > - tasklet_init(&intf->recv_tasklet, > > > - smi_recv_tasklet, > > > - (unsigned long) intf); > > > + tasklet_setup(&intf->recv_tasklet, > > > + smi_recv_tasklet); > > > atomic_set(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver, 0); > > > spin_lock_init(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock); > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->xmit_msgs); > > > @@ -4467,10 +4466,10 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf) > > > } > > > } > > > > > > -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long val) > > > +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t) > > > { > > > unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */ > > > - struct ipmi_smi *intf = (struct ipmi_smi *) val; > > > + struct ipmi_smi *intf = from_tasklet(intf, t, recv_tasklet); > > > int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion; > > > struct ipmi_smi_msg *newmsg = NULL; > > > > > > @@ -4542,7 +4541,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf, > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags); > > > > > > if (run_to_completion) > > > - smi_recv_tasklet((unsigned long) intf); > > > + smi_recv_tasklet(&intf->recv_tasklet); > > > else > > > tasklet_schedule(&intf->recv_tasklet); > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > -- > - Allen _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um