From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07150CD37B0 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:33:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:From:To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0fUzcvVS2KRr+xQ1CNolJxMbnI9BleS2wfcJOdWRoHE=; b=SvktXmxhDJp6FC 3KE71tJbwdj7o4OMjGXyx5XzSIuZtvbeuVUrYG5JoI9I1AMyNk4COF6On0CKeGaowjw+P14THAqu1 QDTyu5+u+ExfMEtGUehSQXs3hYUBNgWBTG+1uO62ptktsQfui+HJ/9r7y98UQHV15KW+VcJiUL9ZT paV2baTpiPIZFsEDVKZjFJgI7Epj7LuQ/OP6acIt1n+0pd9XdskfaOLw1ZjmhgU12pBM8ZInTyH0F ubaSZBeyQQ3kmIfbNZESGmIm2SDBro1fE45wuKJwzZbdGmzEf3JdkaJI7uNaGNJPuiY0T+Exw0DiK Xp439puLgtI8dk/rK6lg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qiHBc-00Fsfs-0M; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:33:24 +0000 Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch ([185.70.43.17]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qiHBT-00FsdG-2z for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:33:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=n8pjl.ca; s=protonmail2; t=1695054790; x=1695313990; bh=Km91J5JZrnd7URdpT5rh0YawCfFvdMqpbXm9xOXQn1s=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=i0rmuUeQO8UXXFVQQYz64ITh+NJ1f3IIV9UF4KLDj1/0GNS3os5y1sECFShbREJs+ bzmf4Uv8RbiXe7wbn/HkzlxUVhUayBb7Qe3Q0gOTpnJmPFFTMbbF7C3N+0UcUbqqtf 5ZlJwFTT8X6EeWfUEYPQbfYII1IHwWH0ubH33A09OJy0weG1VS4iDXoO9VgzYmfQCM S700jPOLGEPrm/W8fKChRxSGkDe174AxmkvbdPDy++YRuQD4uDc7oEPhYLOeykB8IK Du+ai/T90jG/+2Xx3cMgGSBOxj0YergS0blnyHfzyqW8xfOroUx8oljcH5YtR0jVx8 dXaJS+EMzb4Ng== Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:32:48 +0000 To: geert@linux-m68k.org, jack@suse.cz From: Peter Lafreniere Cc: anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, peter@n8pjl.ca, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, richard@nod.at Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] um: Remove CONFIG_REISERFS_FS from defconfig Message-ID: <20230918163234.8514-1-peter@n8pjl.ca> In-Reply-To: <20230918132614.zmmuc72purc2psik@quack3> References: <20230910232640.113938-1-peter@n8pjl.ca> <20230918125744.4342-1-peter@n8pjl.ca> <20230918132614.zmmuc72purc2psik@quack3> Feedback-ID: 53133685:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230918_093317_312496_A16AF201 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Monday, September 18th, 2023 at 09:26, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 18-09-23 12:58:26, Peter Lafreniere wrote: > > > ReiserFS has been deprecated for a year and a half, yet is still built > > as part of a defconfig UML kernel. > > > > According to commit eb103a51640e ("reiserfs: Deprecate reiserfs"), the > > filesystem is slated to be removed in 2025. Remove it from the defconfig > > profile now, as part of its deprecation process. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Lafreniere peter@n8pjl.ca > > > Makes sense but I've noticed there are many more architectures that define > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS in their defconfig (sh, powerpc, mips, m68k, ia64, arm, > alpha). So perhaps we should do this for all of them when we are at it? I agree. I can send a patch series for those arches except for ia64, which has already been removed from linux-next. > > Honza > > > --- > > Fixed invalid DKIM settings causing the previous patch to be rejected. > > > > arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig | 1 - > > arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 1 - > > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig b/arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig > > index e543cbac8792..9c9c77f1255a 100644 > > --- a/arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig > > +++ b/arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig > > @@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ CONFIG_UML_NET_DAEMON=y > > CONFIG_UML_NET_MCAST=y > > CONFIG_UML_NET_SLIRP=y > > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > > -CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y > > CONFIG_QUOTA=y > > CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS=m > > CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=m > > diff --git a/arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig b/arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig > > index 939cb12318ca..03b10d3f6816 100644 > > --- a/arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig > > +++ b/arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig > > @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ CONFIG_UML_NET_DAEMON=y > > CONFIG_UML_NET_MCAST=y > > CONFIG_UML_NET_SLIRP=y > > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > > -CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y > > CONFIG_QUOTA=y > > CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS=m > > CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=m > > -- > > 2.42.0 > > -- > Jan Kara jack@suse.com > > SUSE Labs, CRi _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um