From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624C1C54E41 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:46:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=Z+gtGQnd7649aJaQBgZX3EXXYvWVCzrVQ9Rpd6VeQPk=; b=KviYA1YKHmKCj/fG4+h8HUlWJS 5pZ6eFzunL31PsgdFs4QAo7hv34bNpvn/jNmRZYYzHJJB2aK1RJRPuB8/d/1K9XVJG9wCEVyXhykm JTUAStnkrhvFWDsZyx1k0c5FgWYWNQpC2+W7IGdVwfB76TANNlV34ZWLCE+d3kgT5digZo8YG5UkM +ETeHnatzrsLHV5fufy3mC7AOUbWHGnjpbJ6/0VQZe8KdJkNVDgVH8djO4RoCFXLQh7sc0Xjbg0Gj 7pm1NUE6ef9xMEHecyBp4AuKz/vWmFm/SRNEUUhgcqXBTeKHEzUD0cbX65uZbpTVhU4dlB7GTDVOB Oh+PXtMA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rhpjE-000000004aS-39cX; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:46:32 +0000 Received: from out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.133]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rhpjA-000000004Wz-0RHL for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:46:30 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1709725578; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=Z+gtGQnd7649aJaQBgZX3EXXYvWVCzrVQ9Rpd6VeQPk=; b=qyIuiAJt0ETnUUEtYrtVYBlLPV4k2UQFMXbkmhH902yyV2pD3QfBodsIqyyCAOZ12RKd2lLyaCx3KrnHrpHew60JBAUkig+gRtZMy4sQ2TNYQ9Ovd+KL3xijrtyJrV235q2O0scRLL+tBIUXa0uA8O2HgdITNiGb7dAPUT2YcRM= X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R201e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045192;MF=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=25;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W1xT8mL_1709725575; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W1xT8mL_1709725575) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 19:46:16 +0800 From: Xuan Zhuo To: virtualization@lists.linux.dev Cc: Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , Hans de Goede , =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= , Vadim Pasternak , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Cornelia Huck , Halil Pasic , Eric Farman , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH vhost v1 0/4] refactor the params of find_vqs() Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 19:46:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20240306114615.88770-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Git-Hash: b9b03370361a Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240306_034628_982291_1FF7FD4F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.50 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This pathset is splited from the http://lore.kernel.org/all/20240229072044.77388-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com That may needs some cycles to discuss. But that notifies too many people. But just the four commits need to notify so many people. And four commits are independent. So I split that patch set, let us review these first. The patch set try to refactor the params of find_vqs(). Then we can just change the structure, when introducing new features. Thanks. v1: 1. fix some comments from ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Xuan Zhuo (4): virtio: find_vqs: pass struct instead of multi parameters virtio: vring_create_virtqueue: pass struct instead of multi parameters virtio: vring_new_virtqueue(): pass struct instead of multi parameters virtio_ring: simplify the parameters of the funcs related to vring_create/new_virtqueue() arch/um/drivers/virtio_uml.c | 31 ++-- drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c | 24 ++-- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 31 ++-- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 33 ++--- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 30 ++-- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 60 ++++---- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 9 +- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 16 ++- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 38 +++-- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 173 ++++++++--------------- drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 45 +++--- include/linux/virtio_config.h | 77 ++++++++-- include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 82 ++++++----- tools/virtio/virtio_test.c | 4 +- tools/virtio/vringh_test.c | 28 ++-- 15 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 333 deletions(-) -- 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f