From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D55A7C25B75 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:24:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=bVrFouBxNqnIkfq/4jNpLG9EcFBPuVt2joGYYI3zvnM=; b=e4jReO92ASaBU11PKyvVIFuVWf mHwXLtV5fA/8pGGwtQLXgjXmBPvEWC73tDFFcCoNz/tcw/D5ag+Hl2fta7EyncBXpTnmX0Q53MCJw xd66xW7x5Esm3qSiyaaPyq153LXdl2eI37esfnKIaAl3hyCvcG4pne51W+XvT8InP2I6vPLZHYAll MsiFAsWbikIeOldPTfjIBwcYkg0JRhdMV6KKVMJo1tTRbkj6pOofMsZr7flS/+ajmPAXHeSuIGcUb yIrSRo7DcHqQmI6RfFJx1bXA4pr7HIXzewoGbVeNk2Z8pK2ovQbNY8UxYABjKKAE6SDzGlCc989XQ ZUKhBoxg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sD1Ik-0000000ABEE-19SE; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:24:06 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sD1Ih-0000000ABCe-0Ctm for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 12:24:04 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5085768BFE; Fri, 31 May 2024 14:23:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:23:56 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , Josef Bacik , Ilya Dryomov , Dongsheng Yang , Roger Pau Monn?? , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: convert the SCSI ULDs to the atomic queue limits API v2 Message-ID: <20240531122356.GA24343@lst.de> References: <20240531074837.1648501-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240531_052403_268761_EA4F9267 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:07:54AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > If you have other block layer changes depending on this series we'll > probably need a shared branch. I'll need to make several changes to sd.c > to fix reported issues, including a couple in the zeroing/discard > department. Yes, I also want to move the various feature flags that currently abususe queue->flags into the queue limits. In the worst case I could delay that for another merge window, but a shared branch would be a lot nicer.