From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62CEAC021BE for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:35:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gfLaod49ckkklrS5HkMhsUUQYxad/szdqQ5Z3G50Xxc=; b=NwvNnndSEzI7pLjyPc451/zv2N SIHuW9GOwiYRZgMjftvRFcXFmj6HgwC4sIY1tPawvVsOSd1ZWquW8IMjX8y6qz9TL7xOqiMkb8WsP 8Z2gThxeoZ9c4G5zBjVaGhLtA+06kYQx54FPuNVm2JeFXB5qH/O4KECDYO9a9f4XW0eVrBXy/KMxr pt/DsGMjKnaOBgw3jrq4ivCpcMweiRwZJ8tLA2jBXN6LLnh7xiFxe7k1BAlPj6xJfZ50CAqxofFs5 kn2GYU3C2qSbzvBWhAEkPQach9UqLWOHy6KlbcAq1ywxlsxMvj0wZFqmjWvoGiGAZADhfJv9CIp3T uVDeWK/w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tn8Ch-00000002Iac-170y; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:35:23 +0000 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([2a03:a000:7:0:5054:ff:fe1c:15ff]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tn8Cd-00000002IZu-3wtL for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:35:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=gfLaod49ckkklrS5HkMhsUUQYxad/szdqQ5Z3G50Xxc=; b=tF0QJu5lrPkZBMtLbiLy4Bz1tH WcfomiLvJTogVrL3Tm3HLUWsQkmVsguQ3kKBOQtM8U1GP7NJTm4ssI9t7V04farVLYkNl1rieqwyh AYSqiINBHrXOLqT/4WE0ylXNEahosCIQYeUXTO05cznqwrBCaYnLaDJ4v/F2/+SMW77u27JkdVbk7 POrmBkRBps1JfVkaaZcTMMr9f1snr1/bo7w0g/WJqGnPjJENRjtAM1aQzSSkLMGj7I9isyfI6s1mj u5K5s0hWNEvdijcR5mlFiz1dJ7GYBCwzTYwxiL+DTreVwX0/EmcMRkQcOUucQheqL6UTfDWQNlXXN fRD4wEqA==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tn8CQ-00000008k3i-3dIs; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:35:06 +0000 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:35:06 +0000 From: Al Viro To: NeilBrown Cc: Trond Myklebust , "xiubli@redhat.com" , "brauner@kernel.org" , "idryomov@gmail.com" , "okorniev@redhat.com" , "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" , "Dai.Ngo@oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "johannes@sipsolutions.net" , "chuck.lever@oracle.com" , "jlayton@kernel.org" , "anna@kernel.org" , "miklos@szeredi.hu" , "anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com" , "jack@suse.cz" , "tom@talpey.com" , "richard@nod.at" , "linux-um@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "netfs@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "senozhatsky@chromium.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Change inode_operations.mkdir to return struct dentry * Message-ID: <20250226033506.GE2023217@ZenIV> References: <> <50e6b21c644b050a29e159c9484a5e01061434f6.camel@hammerspace.com> <174053988113.102979.18024415194793753569@noble.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <174053988113.102979.18024415194793753569@noble.neil.brown.name> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250225_193519_984200_1C7E05A7 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.81 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:18:01PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > Thanks. I'll submit a patch through the VFS tree as I have other VFS > patches in the works that will depend on that so having them together > would be good. Do it on top of mainline, please (say, -rc4) and let's put it into a separate branch - easier that way to pull it into other branches without causing headache.