linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@linux.dev>
To: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com,
	benjamin@sipsolutions.net, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tiwei.btw@antgroup.com, tiwei.bie@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] um: Add initial SMP support
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250912004501.2565976-1-tiwei.bie@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03cb4661a6135a641c5a3779f2cb424356b8e345.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:32:56 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-08-10 at 13:51 +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw@antgroup.com>
> > 
> > Add initial symmetric multi-processing (SMP) support to UML. With
> > this support enabled, users can tell UML to start multiple virtual
> > processors, each represented as a separate host thread.
> > 
> > In UML, kthreads and normal threads (when running in kernel mode)
> > can be scheduled and executed simultaneously on different virtual
> > processors. However, the userspace code of normal threads still
> > runs within their respective single-threaded stubs.
> > 
> > That is, SMP support is currently available both within the kernel
> > and across different processes, but still remains limited within
> > threads of the same process in userspace.
> 
> Another thing that isn't covered is anything relating to interrupt
> affinity, I guess? Is that automatically not working, or will it look
> like you can change things but that not do anything?
> 
> I don't think it's important now (though eventually I would actually
> like to have it for our simulations), but was just thinking about it.

Currently, our irq_chips haven't implemented the irq_set_affinity
method, so setting IRQ affinity is not supported at the moment, e.g.,
attempting to set affinity through /proc/irq/IRQ#/smp_affinity will
fail with EPERM. And yeah, we should support it eventually. :)

Regards,
Tiwei


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-12  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-10  5:51 [PATCH v2 00/10] um: Add SMP support Tiwei Bie
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] um: Stop tracking virtual CPUs via mm_cpumask() Tiwei Bie
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] um: Remove unused cpu_data and current_cpu_data macros Tiwei Bie
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] um: vdso: Implement __vdso_getcpu() via syscall Tiwei Bie
2025-09-10 11:59   ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-11  4:29     ` Tiwei Bie
2025-09-21 20:00     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-22  4:50       ` Tiwei Bie
2025-09-22 12:05         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-22 12:12           ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-22 14:01             ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-22 15:14               ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-22 16:04                 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-22 17:07                   ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-25 17:08                     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-21 13:20                     ` Johannes Berg
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] um: Turn signals_* into thread-local variables Tiwei Bie
2025-09-10 12:15   ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-11  4:34     ` Tiwei Bie
2025-09-11  7:37       ` Benjamin Berg
2025-09-11  8:06         ` Benjamin Berg
2025-09-12  0:30           ` Tiwei Bie
2025-09-12  7:58             ` Benjamin Berg
2025-09-12 13:27               ` Tiwei Bie
2025-09-11  9:44         ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-11 10:35           ` Benjamin Berg
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] um: Determine sleep based on need_resched() Tiwei Bie
2025-09-10 12:10   ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-11  4:39     ` Tiwei Bie
2025-09-11  6:59       ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-12  0:59         ` Tiwei Bie
2025-09-11  9:27   ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-12  0:54     ` Tiwei Bie
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] um: Define timers on a per-CPU basis Tiwei Bie
2025-08-10  9:49   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] um: Remove unused ipi_pipe field from cpuinfo_um Tiwei Bie
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] um: Add initial SMP support Tiwei Bie
2025-09-11  9:32   ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-12  0:45     ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2025-09-12  7:58       ` Johannes Berg
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] asm-generic: percpu: Add assembly guard Tiwei Bie
2025-09-10 12:12   ` Johannes Berg
2025-08-10  5:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] um: Enable SMP support on x86 Tiwei Bie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250912004501.2565976-1-tiwei.bie@linux.dev \
    --to=tiwei.bie@linux.dev \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benjamin@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tiwei.btw@antgroup.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).