From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: hugh@mimosa.com
Subject: [uml-devel] unkillable UML threads
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:40:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25476.1064407242@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> (raw)
FYI: This is without the skas patch, with a stock RH9 kernel on the host.
Any thoughts or coroboration would be appreciated. Clearly this is a
bug in the RH9 kernel.
I'm not sure the revision.
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 03:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: "D. Hugh Redelmeier" <hugh@mimosa.com>
Reply-To: "D. Hugh Redelmeier" <hugh@mimosa.com>
To: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
cc: FreeS/WAN Design <design@lists.freeswan.org>
Subject: Re: [design] test failures in HEAD
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309220422270.26952-100000@redshift.mimosa.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309230304340.26952-100000@redshift.mimosa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've made some progress with make check on Red Hat Linux 9, but I'm at
a problem that looks bad.
I have some UML kernel processes appear to be unkillable. They don't
respond to kill -9 by me, nor to kill -9 by the superuser. They are
not zombies.
Here's one that I"ve attacked:
F UID PID PPID PRI NI VSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TTY TIME COMMAND
1 104 7622 1 15 0 33404 7200 get_si T ? 0:00 /home/hugh/swan/umls/uml2.4.22-sept/umlbuild/east/linux (east) [lwdnsq] !
As far as I know, that means we have a RHL9 kernel bug. No process
should be unkillable.
Second opinion, anyone?
Hugh Redelmeier
hugh@mimosa.com voice: +1 416 482-8253
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBP2/yQsFAuQPManGZAQG3AQP+M2Qja5DZ+o5+JBAFJnQ+22jGsdxP/GnM
0nJIeKo0lbvRimCnCtM7VaXz4GGZmqyAzwXS4g4iOEXrNuv67hLUpdlPqj9/Qm5w
Wk3aXo1F/lDNiwQ+xG3+fjt3dWMTXvGE0wqXp2iRQNIciBtipymUqsEM/0Bpxwc1
cbKmbnG3ELk=
=jpnE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-24 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-24 12:40 Michael Richardson [this message]
2003-09-24 14:30 ` [uml-devel] unkillable UML threads Matt Zimmerman
2003-09-25 14:40 ` Michael Richardson
2003-10-06 21:18 ` Jeff Dike
2003-10-07 1:09 ` Michael Richardson
2003-10-07 3:20 ` Jeff Dike
2003-10-07 23:39 ` Michael Richardson
2003-10-11 4:15 ` Matt Zimmerman
2003-10-16 20:15 ` Jan Hudec
2003-10-16 20:32 ` Matt Zimmerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25476.1064407242@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca \
--to=mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca \
--cc=hugh@mimosa.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox