From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@lig.net>
To: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: What is the most up to date, least crashing kernel+patch?
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:31:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40095537.1090602@lig.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87llo6hmmc.fsf@bytesex.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1039 bytes --]
Thank you very much!!
BTW, I solved stability and performance problems by lowering the memory
setting ro 430M, using the 2.4.20 UML kernel, still with my 2.6.1+skas3
host, and getting around to TMPDIR=/dev/shm (doh!).
If I can build in everything I need by rebuilding a kernel, I can live
without modules. In particular, I need IPv6, IPSec, and other advanced
networking.
sdw
Gerd Knorr wrote:
>"Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@lig.net> writes:
>
>
>
>>I would like 2.6.1 as a UML kernel along with support for >512 UML ram
>>and preferrably modules. What is the best I can get right now?
>>
>>I'm running Gerd/SuSE's 2.6.0-test9,
>>
>>
>
>ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kraxel/i386/ has 2.6.1 rpms since a few
>hours. Both binary and source rpms, both uml and host, host with
>skas3, all building out a single source tree. Modules don't work yet
>through.
>
> Gerd
>
>
>
--
swilliams@hpti.com http://www.hpti.com Personal: sdw@lig.net http://sdw.st
Stephen D. Williams 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax 20147-4622 AIM: sdw
[-- Attachment #2: sdw.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 234 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Stephen Williams
n:Williams;Stephen
email;internet:sdw@lig.net
tel;work:703-724-0118
tel;fax:703-995-0407
tel;pager:sdwpage@lig.net
tel;home:703-729-5405
tel;cell:703-371-9362
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-17 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-17 3:11 [uml-devel] What is the most up to date, least crashing kernel+patch? Stephen D. Williams
2004-01-17 10:53 ` [uml-devel] " Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 15:31 ` Stephen D. Williams [this message]
2004-01-17 18:12 ` [uml-devel] " Adam Heath
2004-01-17 18:25 ` Stephen D. Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40095537.1090602@lig.net \
--to=sdw@lig.net \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).