From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: User-mode-linux-devel <User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: problems with UML, issues with includes
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:18:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40451634.70902@nortelnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200403022322.i22NM8Wo003853@ccure.user-mode-linux.org
Jeff Dike wrote:
> cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com said:
>
>>#1 0xa00d03d6 in activate_fd (irq=3, fd=47, type=1,
>>dev_id=0xa02309f8) at irq_user.c:230
>>
>
> Why don't your line numbers match mine?
I've added debug statements.
The kfree you seem to be talking
> about is this:
>
> 211 out_unlock:
> 212 irq_unlock(flags);
> 213 kfree(new_fd);
> 214 out:
>
> And I totally don't see a problem there. new_fd isn't on any lists when it's
> freed there.
As mentioned in my other message, I'm seeing um_kmalloc() return a
new_fd address that is *already* on the active_fds list. Hence it ends
up looking like a dupe, hence we end up calling kfree() on an address
that is still on the active_fds list.
I made the following changes within activate_fd() to try and see what's
going on. If I set a breakpoint at the "redo=1" line and then step
through the code, I end up in a continuous loop getting the same value
for the return code of um_kmalloc(). There's something fishy going on
here....
get_mem:
new_fd = um_kmalloc(sizeof(*new_fd));
err = -ENOMEM;
if(new_fd == NULL)
goto out;
redo = 0;
flags = irq_lock();
for(irq_fd = active_fds; irq_fd != NULL; irq_fd = irq_fd->next){
if (irq_fd == new_fd) {
redo = 1;
}
}
irq_unlock(flags);
if (redo)
goto get_mem;
Chris
--
Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10
Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-02 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-01 22:07 [uml-devel] problems with UML, issues with includes Chris Friesen
2004-03-02 1:00 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2004-03-02 15:08 ` Chris Friesen
2004-03-02 18:06 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-03-02 20:54 ` Jeff Dike
2004-03-02 22:26 ` Chris Friesen
2004-03-02 23:22 ` Jeff Dike
2004-03-02 23:18 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2004-03-02 23:37 ` [uml-devel] Re: problems with UML -- new data with memory debugging on Chris Friesen
2004-03-03 1:33 ` Jeff Dike
2004-03-03 16:49 ` Chris Friesen
2004-03-08 21:34 ` Jeff Dike
2004-03-08 21:08 ` Chris Friesen
2004-03-02 23:03 ` [uml-devel] Re: problems with UML, issues with includes Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40451634.70902@nortelnetworks.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox