From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Current state of UML
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:28:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <413B76DB.5010600@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408251746.53523.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Just a FWIW...
Using the latest UML code in 2.6.x BitKeeper (2.6.9-rc1-bk), things are
looking pretty darn good. I was able to boot a Fedora Core userland
with "init=/bin/sh", set up networking easily [uml_net helper worked],
and ssh into my virtual host.
To problems, one major and two minor:
(major)
1) Using standard Fedora Core SysvInit, rc.sysinit will proceed to
completion, then the userland boot halts. ps shows the virtual host's
/sbin/init process in constant run state, chewing CPU time like mad.
Didn't investigate further, simply booted with init=/bin/sh and moved on.
(minor)
2) The Makefiles appear to add "-um1" to the kernel version for some
reason, and IMHO violates the Principle of Least Surprise. This breaks
several of my scripts :(
3) The arch/um build is verbose, showing each gcc command line as it is
executed. This is incorrect when KBUILD_VERBOSE or similar setting are
not enabled. As a result, the arch/um is verbose, but the rest is not,
by default.
Overall I am really impressed. Like other arches in the Linux kernel,
it is IMO very important to be able to work "out of the box", without
patches.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-05 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-19 3:00 [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.7-2 Jeff Dike
2004-08-27 7:10 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-09-05 19:35 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-08 23:15 ` Jeff Dike
2004-09-05 15:35 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-05 20:28 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-09-06 17:56 ` [uml-devel] Current state of UML BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 4:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-07 5:05 ` Adam Heath
2004-09-07 5:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-07 5:39 ` Adam Heath
2004-09-07 18:13 ` [uml-devel] Current state of UML - some help needed from mainline BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 5:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-08 20:40 ` [uml-devel] Re: Current state of UML Jeff Dike
2004-09-09 0:35 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.7-2 Jeff Dike
2004-09-11 14:41 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 21:16 ` [uml-devel] Compiling UML 2.6.8.1 with Static Linking results in segfault Michael Ralston
2004-09-08 0:18 ` Jeff Dike
2004-09-07 23:57 ` Michael Ralston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=413B76DB.5010600@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox