From: Peter <peter.repliesignored@rimuhosting.com>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: 2.6.9-bb1, 2.4.27-bs1, SKAS3/2.6-V7 released
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:17:35 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <419028BF.3090308@rimuhosting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200411052042.22095.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Hi. Host is 2.6.9-skas3-v7. Guest is linux.2.4.27-bs1. I restarted a
UML guest 24 times ok. After that I got these two processes that won't
die.
xxxxd 30282 0.0 0.1 132344 3988 ? D 01:21 0:00
/home/umlusers/xxxxd.net/linux umid=leventd.net con=null con0=fd:
xxxxd 30284 0.0 0.1 132344 3988 ? T 01:21 0:00 \_
/home/umlusers/xxxxd.net/linux umid=xxxxd.net con=null con0
I've sent them kill signals from 1 thru 64 (including, of course,
SIGCONT) and neither process is interested in quitting.
I can't strace to the second process (attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH,
...): Operation not permitted)
There is nothing happening on the strace of the first process.
Is there any more info I can provide that would be of use?
In the meantime, I'm taking this host kernel back to 2.6.8.1 to see if
that is going to be any better. I have another server that I can 'play'
with 2.6.9 later on if we can make some progress on this problem.
Cheers, Peter
> From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade_spam <at> yahoo.it>
> Subject: 2.6.9-bb1, 2.4.27-bs1, SKAS3/2.6-V7 released
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel, gmane.linux.uml.devel, gmane.linux.uml.user
> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:32:31 +0100
>
> You can find all on http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/.
>
> The SKAS3/2.6-v7 was already released, but I probably forgot to announce it.
> So I'm announcing it now.
>
> Changes in SKAS:
> * echo 0 > /proc/sysemu on the guests works fine, finally!
>
> Changes in both 2.6.9 and 2.4.27:
> they run fine on 2.6.9 host kernels, without hanging at the exit.
>
> Changes in 2.6.9 only:
> included a large chunk of JDike tree (excluding all x86_64 related patches),
> and all the latest security patches from Bodo Stroesser; also it includes the
> -V7 skas patch in it.
>
> Actually, however, to do this I had to include big, invasive patches from Jeff
> Dike's tree. I've done it because it's needed and because Bodo Stroesser
> worked with the incrementals very fine.
>
> Changes in 2.4.27 only:
>
> It's based on a fork from the official 2.4.24-1; the patches I've included
> come almost totally from there, but I dropped all the hostfs rewrite. I also
> included some incrementals, the one I thought safe.
>
> Also, you can find on the page the instructions to avoid the "hwclock hang" in
> TT mode. I found the faulty patch, but it needs a more worse bug, which
> affects everyone running in TT mode on a 2.6 host, so it's included. You can
> revert the patch if you want, and if you have to run it on a 2.4 host. I sent
> a message about this about a week ago, but I got no answer.
>
> Distribution:
> * the patch are also in split-out form, both web-browsable and tarballed.
> * md5sums are available (to test with "md5sum -c *.md5").
>
> Any testing and report is welcome.
>
> Bye
> --
> Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
> Linux registered user n. 292729
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-09 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-05 2:59 [uml-devel] __wrap_malloc compile error without CONFIG_MODE_TT Peter
2004-11-05 19:42 ` Blaisorblade
2004-11-09 2:17 ` Peter [this message]
2004-11-09 18:35 ` [uml-devel] Re: 2.6.9-bb1, 2.4.27-bs1, SKAS3/2.6-V7 released Blaisorblade
2004-11-09 23:12 ` Peter
2004-11-10 8:43 ` stian
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-04 18:32 [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2004-11-08 12:28 ` [uml-devel] " Nuutti Kotivuori
2004-11-09 11:41 ` Blaisorblade
2004-11-09 18:06 ` Bodo Stroesser
2004-11-09 18:50 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=419028BF.3090308@rimuhosting.com \
--to=peter.repliesignored@rimuhosting.com \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox