From: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User-mode-linux-devel Digest, Vol 3, Issue 35
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:08:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F35B5D.9000404@nagafix.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1105.1156792439.14176.user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Tony wrote:
> It wouldn't hurt to have additional mirrors/backups of the data.
That, I can provide. I never realized that it was needed.
> Initially, we should identify a means for stopping the spam.
I may be able to help here.
I don't think my filters are any better than sf.net's, but seeing the
kind of traffic on the MLs it shouldn't be too hard to filter over 95%
of the spam and then apply a white-listing scheme: add a spam-assassin
rule with UML/kernel/gcc keywords - any mail without any of those is
very likely to be spam if not whitelisted (delay it).
> (...)
> A better approach would be to unify these under a single domain as a
> common repository for information.
I agree that this would make it clearer for first time users.
There is an awful lot of information there, it's just not very well
organized: users should be able to browse click download and run UML
without seeing all the information that developers need to see (and vice
versa)
> However, this takes volunteer time and effort. Perhaps you should
> consider soliciting the community for a "web master"?
Perhaps the community can act as many webmasters, rather than the single
point of failure. I know quite a few examples where this has worked
really well. Was this what you implied?
> > Don't misunderstand me, I don't want to refuse help from the
> > community or
> > consider it less, nor to criticize anybody, but the wiki _is_
> > important, and
> > it should have a more central role.
> I agree that it should have a more central role.
Me too.
> However, I disagree
> with the assumption that anyone besides you and Jeff are of
> questionable persistence. Many people have coughed up resources, time
> and support for the project over the past several years. While a more
> organized approach is in order, it doesn't mean that you can't trust
> anyone besides Jeff.
Again, I agree...
Antoine
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-28 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <mailman.1105.1156792439.14176.user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44F35B5D.9000404@nagafix.co.uk \
--to=antoine@nagafix.co.uk \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox