From: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:04:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B364DC.8040405@nagafix.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45B32F92.80409@panasas.com>
>> On fully up to date Fedora Core 6 x86_64, the kernel does display
>> something before crashing:
>> # uname -a
>> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6 #1 SMP Wed Dec 20 14:51:34
>> EST 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> # ./kernel32-2.6.19.2
>> Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
>> Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...missing
>> Checking for tmpfs mount on /dev/shm...OK
>> Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /dev/shm/...OK
>> Checking for the skas3 patch in the host:
>> - /proc/mm...not found
>> - PTRACE_FAULTINFO...not found
>> - PTRACE_LDT...not found
>> UML running in SKAS0 mode
>>
>> [root@localhost home]#
>>
>> This is 100% repeatable. Plain Fedora.
>> Many users will have a similar setup and will just give up on UML.
>> So I as I said before, UML is currently unusable for most people out
>> there running fairly recent systems.
> I have a 2.6.19, vanila kernel on top of redhat4, host.
There is one major difference in this case, redhat4 uses glibc 2.3
whereas fc6 (and gentoo-current) use glibc 2.4
A lot of the problems that I am reporting started when glibc was
upgraded (sorry I forgot to mention that)
> And any kernel between 2.6.17 - 2.6.20-rc5 x86_64 for guests.
> For my iSCSI tests they all run well.
> At the very beginning, I had bad crashes and I solved it with plain gdb.
> The point for us to use UML, from the begging, was to use gdb on our own kernel development.
> At the end it was very easy to find that I have miss-configured the uml kernel, when that was fixed every thing
> ran well.
>
> for me I just do
> #gdb um/vmlinux (was compiled with -O um)
> gdb>run ubd0=/var/opt/FedoraCore5-AMD64-root_fs eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.0.117
> after first trap in gdb
> gdb>handle SIGUSR1 pass nostop noprint
> from than on its strait gdb, tell me if you need a script for loading symbols of kernel modules.
That would be great, it could go on the wiki too.
Thanks
Antoine
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-21 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-17 16:15 [uml-devel] UML/64bit is miscompiled by gcc 4.0.3 on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Blaisorblade
2007-01-17 18:17 ` Christopher S. Aker
2007-01-17 18:15 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-17 19:50 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 11:00 ` [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64? Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 16:07 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2007-01-19 16:14 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 16:38 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2007-01-19 16:42 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 17:33 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 19:56 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-21 9:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2007-01-21 13:04 ` Antoine Martin [this message]
2007-01-23 15:20 ` Boaz Harrosh
2007-01-21 14:38 ` Joel Palmius
2007-01-21 14:46 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-21 14:55 ` Joel Palmius
2007-01-21 16:11 ` Joel Palmius
2007-01-22 22:09 ` Jeff Dike
2007-01-23 0:59 ` Antoine Martin
2007-01-19 16:38 ` Antoine Martin
2007-02-15 3:43 ` [uml-devel] UML/64bit is miscompiled by gcc 4.0.3 on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Blaisorblade
2007-01-19 23:31 ` Blaisorblade
2007-01-17 23:26 ` Jeff Dike
2007-01-19 23:18 ` Blaisorblade
2007-01-22 20:59 ` Jeff Dike
2007-01-23 8:09 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B364DC.8040405@nagafix.co.uk \
--to=antoine@nagafix.co.uk \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox