Am 07.06.2012 22:59, schrieb Martin Pärtel:
> Signal handlers in UML guest processes now get correct siginfo_t fields
> for SIGTRAP, SIGFPE, SIGILL and SIGBUS. Specifically, si_addr and si_code
> are now correct where previously they were si_addr = NULL and si_code = 128.

What exactly is broken?
In my SIGSEGV test case si_addr is not NULL, it contains the correct faulting address.

> +
> +			ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO, pid, 0, &si);
> +

Doesn't this leak the host siginfo_t into the guest?

Thanks,
//richard