From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/3] BUG: Inapprorpiate choice of IPC
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 07:16:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531C1559.2080404@kot-begemot.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531BA8D0.2050307@nod.at>
Yes, that is why I resent it.
My mistake when moving the commits from the main tree to a branch which
was just for submission.
The file.c frag is from patch-2 (the memory corruption one).
Please use the resent version, it has them in the right places.
Alternatively, I can resend them again off-list.
A.
On 08/03/14 23:33, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> Am 07.03.2014 19:37, schrieb anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk:
>> From: Anton Ivanov <antivano@cisco.com>
>>
>> PIPE is the wrong IPC for this type of inter-thread communication.
>>
>> For more details see:
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4624071/pipe-buffer-size-is-4k-or-64k
>>
>> The observations on that thread have been confirmed by us for UML's
>> UBD driver. If you load UML with network IO and do disk IO at the same
>> time the UBD IO helper thread fails to process requests fast enough.
>>
>> In most cases this will lead to a slowdown in disk IO as well as
>> inability to execute new processes until the network load goes away.
>> In some cases however it will not recover. Example - with our new high
>> performance 1G+ network drivers a wget of 1G file from the network
>> is a nearly guaranteed crash if it writes out to UBD.
>>
>> The crashes and the slowdowns are not observed with this patch -
>> it switches the IPC to socket which does not have the pipe granularity
>> and queue size problems.
>>
>> This signifies a problem with overall UBD error handling which this
>> patch fails to fix. The workaround should be good enough for most
>> cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anton Ivanov <antivano@cisco.com>
>> ---
>> arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 2 +-
>> arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c | 2 +-
>> arch/um/os-Linux/file.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>> index 944453a..c9a5717 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
>> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static void do_ubd_request(struct request_queue *q)
>> n = os_write_file(thread_fd, &io_req,
>> sizeof(struct io_thread_req *));
>> if(n != sizeof(struct io_thread_req *)){
>> - if(n != -EAGAIN)
>> + if(!((n == -EAGAIN) || (n == -ENOBUFS)))
>> printk("write to io thread failed, "
>> "errno = %d\n", -n);
>> else if(list_empty(&dev->restart))
>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c
>> index 007b94d..f1f84a4 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c
>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ int start_io_thread(unsigned long sp, int *fd_out)
>> {
>> int pid, fds[2], err;
>>
>> - err = os_pipe(fds, 1, 1);
>> + err = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, (int *) &fds);
>> if(err < 0){
>> printk("start_io_thread - os_pipe failed, err = %d\n", -err);
>> goto out;
>> diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c
>> index c879b12..a4f0e65 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c
>> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ void os_close_file(int fd)
>> int os_fsync_file(int fd)
>> {
>> if (fsync(fd) < 0)
>> - return -errno
>> + return -errno;
> Huh?
> I think this does not belong to the patch.
>
> The other drivers look good. Thanks a lot for pushing this work upstream!
> We are already at -rc5. I'll send the patches to Linus within the next merge window
> and mark them for stable.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
--
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job,
wait until you hire an amateur."
Paul Neal "Red" Adair
A. R. Ivanov
E-mail: anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-09 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 18:37 [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/3] BUG: Missing pipe handling anton.ivanov
2014-03-07 18:37 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/3] BUG: Memory corruption on startup anton.ivanov
2014-03-07 18:37 ` [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/3] BUG: Inapprorpiate choice of IPC anton.ivanov
2014-03-08 23:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-03-09 7:16 ` Anton Ivanov [this message]
2014-04-20 21:28 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-04-20 21:57 ` Anton Ivanov (antivano)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531C1559.2080404@kot-begemot.co.uk \
--to=anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox