From: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
To: UML devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [uml-devel] fuzz testing a 32 bit UML guest - ssh login won't work since a hour
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:47:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DBEEC4.9020406@gmx.de> (raw)
Fuzz testing a 32 bit x86 Gentoo UML guest (especially NFSv4 files, nfs sserver and client runs within the UML guest) with current git kernel brought the guest into a state, where no ssh login is any longer possible.
At the host side I can see that the linux processes are still running.
I attached the gdb to the linux processes at the host (even 32 bit x86 Gentoo). I do get nearly all the time:
Thread 1 (process 4252):
#0 0xb7736aec in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x08496faf in __nanosleep_nocancel () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
#2 0x08073124 in idle_sleep (nsecs=606859328243668608) at arch/um/os-Linux/time.c:183
#3 0x08060b3f in arch_cpu_idle () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:208
#4 0x080a5405 in cpuidle_idle_call () at kernel/sched/idle.c:120
#5 cpu_idle_loop () at kernel/sched/idle.c:224
#6 cpu_startup_entry (state=CPUHP_ONLINE) at kernel/sched/idle.c:272
#7 0x084e16d2 in rest_init () at init/main.c:419
#8 0x0804892e in start_kernel () at init/main.c:679
#9 0x08049fc9 in start_kernel_proc (unused=0x0) at arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c:46
#10 0x0806064b in new_thread_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:129
#11 0x00000000 in ?? ()
...
but at least one time I got:
0x08108de3 in __put_super (sb=0x86a60000) at fs/super.c:246
246 if (!--sb->s_count) {
Thread 1 (process 4252):
#0 0x08108de3 in __put_super (sb=0x86a60000) at fs/super.c:246
#1 0x081096ac in put_super (sb=<optimized out>) at fs/super.c:262
#2 drop_super (sb=0x86a60000) at fs/super.c:487
#3 0x0812a337 in __writeback_inodes_wb (wb=0x8421c09c, work=0x1) at fs/fs-writeback.c:733
#4 0x0812a479 in wb_writeback (wb=0x8421c09c, work=0x869d7efc) at fs/fs-writeback.c:863
#5 0x0812a74e in wb_check_background_flush (wb=<optimized out>) at fs/fs-writeback.c:944
#6 wb_do_writeback (wb=<optimized out>) at fs/fs-writeback.c:1014
#7 bdi_writeback_workfn (work=0x8421c0a8) at fs/fs-writeback.c:1043
#8 0x08090d11 in process_one_work (worker=0x84325000, work=0x8421c0a8) at kernel/workqueue.c:2081
#9 0x0809116a in worker_thread (__worker=0x84325000) at kernel/workqueue.c:2212
#10 0x08096806 in kthread (_create=0x84207410) at kernel/kthread.c:207
#11 0x0806064b in new_thread_handler () at arch/um/kernel/process.c:129
#12 0x00000000 in ?? ()
...
Now I'm wondering if this is an issue which is worth to be debugged or whether I just should ignore it.
BTW the nsecs of 2 gdb calls in a row are identical since few minutes : 606859328243668608
before the value was : 606859328233668608
--
Toralf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53DBEEC4.9020406@gmx.de \
--to=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox