linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] kernel stalls in balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited()
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:36:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5448BE29.6080103@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5448AF6E.6090201@kot-begemot.co.uk>

Anton,

Am 23.10.2014 um 09:34 schrieb Anton Ivanov:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> I have had a question in my mind on this for quite a while around this bug (and a quite a few others).

Fell free to ask, I'll try hand to find time to answer.

> UML by the nature of being UP includes the generic spinlock definition for UP which does very little if any.

Correct. IIRC they are a NOP on UML as it does not support preemption.

> How exactly does this work on a multicore host if you have a different thread hitting the same critical section and that thread is running on a different core? Isn't that
> effectively a form of weird SMP (which in turn requires stricter locking). Am I missing something here?

>>From the host side of view the UML kernel a single process and therefore there is no parallel execution at all.

Does this help?

Thanks,
//richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-23  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-13 21:48 [uml-devel] kernel stalls in balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() Thomas Meyer
2014-10-14  5:38 ` Anton Ivanov
2014-10-14  6:43   ` Anton Ivanov
2014-10-14  7:21     ` Thomas Meyer
2014-10-14  7:31       ` Anton Ivanov
2014-10-19 14:59         ` Thomas Meyer
2014-10-19 16:02           ` Anton Ivanov
2014-10-19 19:35             ` Thomas Meyer
2014-10-20 20:01               ` Thomas Meyer
2014-10-23  7:34                 ` Anton Ivanov
2014-10-23  8:36                   ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2014-10-23  8:47                     ` Anton Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5448BE29.6080103@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox