From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iGVbj-00077a-Kq for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 21:59:29 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework References: <20190923090249.127984-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20191004213812.GA24644@mit.edu> From: shuah Message-ID: <56e2e1a7-f8fe-765b-8452-1710b41895bf@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:59:10 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Torvalds , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Petr Mladek , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Peter Zijlstra , Amir Goldstein , Brendan Higgins , dri-devel , Sasha Levin , Masahiro Yamada , Michael Ellerman , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Frank Rowand , robh@kernel.org, linux-nvdimm , khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, wfg@linux.intel.com, Joel Stanley , David Rientjes , jdike@addtoit.com, Dan Carpenter , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, shuah , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Tim.Bird@sony.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Steven Rostedt , Julia Lawall , Josh Poimboeuf , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Richard Weinberger , Stephen Boyd , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Randy Dunlap , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Luis Chamberlain , Daniel Vetter , Kees Cook , linux-fsdevel , logang@deltatee.com On 10/4/19 3:42 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 2:39 PM Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >> >> This question is primarily directed at Shuah and Linus.... >> >> What's the current status of the kunit series now that Brendan has >> moved it out of the top-level kunit directory as Linus has requested? > The move happened smack in the middle of merge window and landed in linux-next towards the end of the merge window. > We seemed to decide to just wait for 5.5, but there is nothing that > looks to block that. And I encouraged Shuah to find more kunit cases > for when it _does_ get merged. > Right. I communicated that to Brendan that we could work on adding more kunit based tests which would help get more mileage on the kunit. > So if the kunit branch is stable, and people want to start using it > for their unit tests, then I think that would be a good idea, and then > during the 5.5 merge window we'll not just get the infrastructure, > we'll get a few more users too and not just examples. > thanks, -- Shuah _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um