From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: rrs@debian.org, jdike@addtoit.com
Cc: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:52:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57950E67.20100@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469036869.11733.17.camel@debian.org>
Am 20.07.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
> Hello Richard,
>
> On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 19:39 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as "old" on
>> the
>>> website.
>>> The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at all.
>>>
>>> Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML are?
>
>> Well, I maintain the UML kernel component. That meas I keep it running, fix
>> regressions
>> and try to answer questions from other developers.
>> Since I do this in my spare time there is not much time left for adding new
>> features.
>
>> So, my roadmap is "keep it alive" :-)
>
>
> Okay! Thanks for the update. I had the same impression and am glad to read that
> you will continue to maintain it.
>
>>> And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source Markup
>>> Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1]
>
>> I don't have such a dump. But I agree that we need to rework the website.
>> It is very, very old.
>> Maybe it is worth adding a UML section to http://kernelnewbies.org/?
>
> IN my opinion, the kernel wiki may be a better option for long term maintenance.
> https://wiki.kernel.org/
Agreed.
> The main page for wiki points no login link. But once you get into one of the
> sub wikis, you can see the login link.
> Take this link for example: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php?title=Specia
> l:UserLogin&returnto=Main+Page
>
> Maybe you could ask the kernel infra team to create a sub-wiki house for uml ?
> And then we can all help migrate the content ?
Just sent a request to get a wiki instance. :-)
Thanks,
//richard
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-24 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 17:04 [uml-devel] User Mode Linux Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2016-07-20 17:28 ` Anton Ivanov
2016-07-20 17:39 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-07-20 17:47 ` Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2016-07-24 18:52 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57950E67.20100@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=rrs@debian.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).