From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bROVt-0004mM-Mz for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:52:33 +0000 Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144] helo=radon.swed.at) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1bROVs-0006Pd-9n for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:52:33 +0000 References: <1469034268.11733.10.camel@debian.org> <578FB74F.8080804@nod.at> <1469036869.11733.17.camel@debian.org> From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <57950E67.20100@nod.at> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:52:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1469036869.11733.17.camel@debian.org> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: rrs@debian.org, jdike@addtoit.com Cc: Mattia Dongili , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Am 20.07.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > Hello Richard, > > On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 19:39 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as "old" on >> the >>> website. >>> The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at all. >>> >>> Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML are? > >> Well, I maintain the UML kernel component. That meas I keep it running, fix >> regressions >> and try to answer questions from other developers. >> Since I do this in my spare time there is not much time left for adding new >> features. > >> So, my roadmap is "keep it alive" :-) > > > Okay! Thanks for the update. I had the same impression and am glad to read that > you will continue to maintain it. > >>> And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source Markup >>> Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1] > >> I don't have such a dump. But I agree that we need to rework the website. >> It is very, very old. >> Maybe it is worth adding a UML section to http://kernelnewbies.org/? > > IN my opinion, the kernel wiki may be a better option for long term maintenance. > https://wiki.kernel.org/ Agreed. > The main page for wiki points no login link. But once you get into one of the > sub wikis, you can see the login link. > Take this link for example: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php?title=Specia > l:UserLogin&returnto=Main+Page > > Maybe you could ask the kernel infra team to create a sub-wiki house for uml ? > And then we can all help migrate the content ? Just sent a request to get a wiki instance. :-) Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel