From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:05:01 +0300 In-Reply-To: <8891277c7de92e93d3bfc409df95810ee6f103cd.camel@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1538687224-17535-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8891277c7de92e93d3bfc409df95810ee6f103cd.camel@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: stop using implicit alignement to SMP_CACHE_BYTES From: Mike Rapoport Message-Id: <59C9470E-F718-4A11-BC65-FD68901723AC@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Michal Hocko , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Richard Weinberger , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Matt Turner , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Guan Xuetao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-ID: On October 5, 2018 6:25:38 AM GMT+03:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 00:07 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: >> When a memblock allocation APIs are called with align =3D 0, the >alignment is >> implicitly set to SMP_CACHE_BYTES=2E >>=20 >> Replace all such uses of memblock APIs with the 'align' parameter >explicitly >> set to SMP_CACHE_BYTES and stop implicit alignment assignment in the >> memblock internal allocation functions=2E >>=20 >> For the case when memblock APIs are used via helper functions, e=2Eg=2E >like >> iommu_arena_new_node() in Alpha, the helper functions were detected >with >> Coccinelle's help and then manually examined and updated where >appropriate=2E >>=20 >> The direct memblock APIs users were updated using the semantic patch >below: > >What is the purpose of this ? It sounds rather counter-intuitive=2E=2E=2E Why? I think it actually more intuitive to explicitly set alignment to SMP_CACH= E_BYTES rather than use align =3D 0 because deeply inside allocator it will= be implicitly reset to SMP_CACHE_BYTES=2E=2E=2E >Ben=2E --=20 Sincerely yours, Mike=2E