linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>,
	will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, dev.jain@arm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ioworker0@gmail.com,
	linmag7@gmail.com
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: enable PT_RECLAIM on all 64-bit architectures
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 20:15:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e6d8390-1f9e-40cf-949d-168160fa9a15@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b55623a-4606-4610-a0fe-55b8cd6b95e7@kernel.org>



On 11/19/25 7:38 PM, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 19.11.25 08:31, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>>
>> Now, the MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE is enabled on all 64-bit 
>> architectures,
>> so make PT_RECLAIM depend on 64BIT, thereby enabling PT_RECLAIM on all
>> 64-bit architectures.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
>>   mm/Kconfig       | 9 ++-------
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index eac2e86056902..96bff81fd4787 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ config X86
>>       select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
>>       imply IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT    if EFI
>>       select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE
>> -    select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM        if X86_64
>>       select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT        if SMP
>>       select SCHED_SMT            if SMP
>>       select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_CLUSTER    if SMP
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index d548976d0e0ad..94eec5c0cad96 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1448,14 +1448,9 @@ config ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
>>         The architecture has hardware support for userspace shadow call
>>             stacks (eg, x86 CET, arm64 GCS or RISC-V Zicfiss).
>> -config ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM
>> -    def_bool n
>> -
>>   config PT_RECLAIM
>> -    bool "reclaim empty user page table pages"
>> -    default y
>> -    depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM && MMU && SMP
>> -    select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
>> +    def_bool y
>> +    depends on 64BIT
> 
> As discussed in the other thread, likely
> 
> config PT_RECLAIM
>      def_bool y
>      depends on MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE && 64BIT
> 
> Could be nice, and if possible even dropping the 64BIT limitation as 
> well if there is no need to.

I think it's ok to drop the 64BIT limitation. There should be some
32-bit architectures that already enable MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.

> 
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-19  7:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] enable PT_RECLAIM on all 64-bit architectures Qi Zheng
2025-11-19  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: change mm/pt_reclaim.c to use asm/tlb.h instead of asm-generic/tlb.h Qi Zheng
2025-11-19 11:41   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-19 12:17     ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-19  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] alpha: mm: enable MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE Qi Zheng
2025-11-19  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] LoongArch: " Qi Zheng
2025-11-19  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mips: " Qi Zheng
2025-11-19  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] parisc: " Qi Zheng
2025-11-19  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] um: " Qi Zheng
2025-11-19  7:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: enable PT_RECLAIM on all 64-bit architectures Qi Zheng
2025-11-19 11:38   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-19 12:15     ` Qi Zheng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e6d8390-1f9e-40cf-949d-168160fa9a15@linux.dev \
    --to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linmag7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).