Re: [uml-devel] redefinition of `struct ptrace_faultinfo' with uml-2.4.22-4 + skas3

[Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>]

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003, Jeff Dike yowled:
> nix@esperi.demon.co.uk said:
>> This has come up before on the lists (first report in late 2002), and
>> nobody's ever come up with preprocessed source. Until now. 
> 
> This is nasty because the UML tree has to assume that the i386 tree doesn't
> have ptrace_faultinfo in it.  Since you applied the host skas patch to your
> UML tree, that assumption is broken.

OK. Who knows, maybe this caused some of my bizarre crashes (grasping in
the dark here)...

> So, for now, I would say that you shouldn't try to build both host kernels and
> UML kernels from a tree which has that patch in it.

OK. I should go up to 2.4.22-5 anyway; this gives me an excuse. :)

(I reverted every other patch, but considered that *of course* skas
wouldn't clash with other patches involved in the same project. Oops.)

-- 
`Me, I want exploding spaceships and pulverized worlds and clashes of
 billion-year-old empires *and* competently written sentences.'
                                                    --- Matt Austern


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel