From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DJUi4-0008Sx-AD for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:58:04 -0700 Received: from smtp1.oslo.dnmi.no ([128.39.62.241]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.41) id 1DJUi0-0004gm-Pz for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:58:04 -0700 Received: from freeze.oslo.dnmi.no ([157.249.16.34]) by smtp1.oslo.dnmi.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJUhM-00042G-8V for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:57:20 +0000 Received: from tandem by freeze.oslo.dnmi.no with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DJUhM-0006DP-00 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:57:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Broken compiling under 2.6.12-rc2 on my machine From: Adrian Phillips In-Reply-To: <200504070408.30964.rob@landley.net> (Rob Landley's message of "Thu, 7 Apr 2005 04:08:30 -0400") References: <200504062136.26895.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <200504070408.30964.rob@landley.net> Message-ID: <87k6neq2gf.fsf@freeze.oslo.dnmi.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:57:20 +0200 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> "Rob" == Rob Landley writes: >> > > > System is Debian Woody, >> > >> > Can you post your sed version? and Rob, can you then test it >> and fix the > code? >> >> GNU sed version 3.02 Rob> That said, the change I posted earlier would probably make it Rob> work. The question is, do we care? Documentation/Changes Rob> doesn't list a required sed version (even though other things Rob> in the kernel build use it), but perhaps it should. Well, for Woody users there is always a backports sed - anyone using 2.6 with woody needs at least module-init-tools from backports so one more package won't matter, even though one could be compiling 2.6 on a 2.4 system. Sincerely, Adrian Phillips -- Who really wrote the works of William Shakespeare ? http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shakespeare/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel