From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Eric W. Biederman" In-Reply-To: <20220427160901.GI17421@redhat.com> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:09:03 +0200") References: <878rrrh32q.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220426225211.308418-9-ebiederm@xmission.com> <20220427160901.GI17421@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:33:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87o80m7afv.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] ptrace: Don't change __state To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de, Will Deacon , tj@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , inux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook , Jann Horn List-ID: Oleg Nesterov writes: > On 04/26, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> @@ -253,7 +252,7 @@ static int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, bool ignore_state) >> */ >> if (lock_task_sighand(child, &flags)) { >> if (child->ptrace && child->parent == current) { >> - WARN_ON(READ_ONCE(child->__state) == __TASK_TRACED); >> + WARN_ON(child->jobctl & JOBCTL_DELAY_WAKEKILL); > > This WARN_ON() doesn't look right. > > It is possible that this child was traced by another task and PTRACE_DETACH'ed, > but it didn't clear DELAY_WAKEKILL. That would be a bug. That would mean that PTRACE_DETACHED process can not be SIGKILL'd. > If the new debugger attaches and calls ptrace() before the child takes siglock > ptrace_freeze_traced() will fail, but we can hit this WARN_ON(). Eric