From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE82CCE79A8 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:32:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NL/19ww2o1V53Ss1J5dJgREB5GrXozlzOBv0pWaKWKA=; b=0RLZwwJ5Yi4myW 23aRt4TMobIafUolIe1jQVuYXwZQ1Jc23W4HZNNBhq01xoKcBjMVxnzhL6aSkX0li89QNq4m6pBwL Qgvvk8Id4QIfJpNPdFJAI7kWnwOtVKoMfp/RPdLL+PbMIugEK4GnfVvh2nFO2oBzWRAGPSLfOvZHp mhc2C8BgLiFQLrGKydt+MNl8fQwn7CeQ4LCShlcpuwguWaaxbKrae5XDW53mungkxF6XILdFu2ZKV ZEDX+blc91yraRMCUcjpl+dXwdAMWwB3jNYA66c29H7FW9qXKut6Qjvg4ZHg4VcMKl8PayZojFDYr x/anUunW+LQQvo1dQUcw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qifVv-0014xl-2g; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:31:59 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qifVs-0014w0-29 for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:31:58 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1695148311; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mKyOmmSSJD2Ws4VR+XqPS/XNP5VPNOwNw6yDdf2ZDQU=; b=xXqJqYUZla9VpgC4S4ShTGkMIL3gkkhNvGjlWhi5L1gkuz5icUdocjTZfEjeUV9x1XfF1d 9gCf9onnbE0u4V9GNNs47U9xjPBMw2DWytTSoQsodttKIzqkL+7HlaYEWW4FSVqwFkxP9b m3N7cld1jgwk+v3jf2F2vowyOYzbp0oeTYfBdyMg3skppXJK7mZs9rhgY8B0yUaEjzj5rv eNPjV+ty7EkQisVX1wCgp5HdgxQTcki84SeKDSqMlKMRQ4Dwk5yJNMqTIIkjzdPuUEmZXw ZLXZiD6XCNIDxdM95XJgYydUDvKFSGuDWDp3q+ZqWzDj1uSibW0RuXplJpLfmA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1695148311; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mKyOmmSSJD2Ws4VR+XqPS/XNP5VPNOwNw6yDdf2ZDQU=; b=HSw+FE/2ECBsn8P+jBW//lrHd8c9W9Bxp5rJpQcF0U/qlJOFxqfRtQIDeqJGdvK2cG7ELT v2DdyOFXFBXeLSDg== To: Linus Torvalds , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Matthew Wilcox , Ankur Arora , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, mgorman@suse.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, jon.grimm@amd.com, bharata@amd.com, raghavendra.kt@amd.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Brian Cain , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT In-Reply-To: References: <87zg1u1h5t.fsf@oracle.com> <20230911150410.GC9098@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <87h6o01w1a.fsf@oracle.com> <20230912082606.GB35261@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <87cyyfxd4k.ffs@tglx> <87led2wdj0.ffs@tglx> <0e69f7df80dc5878071deb0d80938138d19de1d1.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20230919134218.GA39281@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 20:31:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87pm2eui95.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230919_113156_842797_C4A4B12C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 10:25, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 06:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: >> >> As Geert poined out, I'm not seeing anything particular problematic with the >> architectures lacking CONFIG_PREEMPT at the moment. This seems to be more >> something about organizing KConfig files. > > It can definitely be problematic. > > Not the Kconfig file part, and not the preempt count part itself. > > But the fact that it has never been used and tested means that there > might be tons of "this architecture code knows it's not preemptible, > because this architecture doesn't support preemption". > > So you may have basic architecture code that simply doesn't have the > "preempt_disable()/enable()" pairs that it needs. > > PeterZ mentioned the generic entry code, which does this for the entry > path. But it actually goes much deeper: just do a > > git grep preempt_disable arch/x86/kernel > > and then do the same for some other architectures. > > Looking at alpha, for example, there *are* hits for it, so at least > some of the code there clearly *tries* to do it. But does it cover all > the required parts? If it's never been tested, I'd be surprised if > it's all just ready to go. > > I do think we'd need to basically continue to support ARCH_NO_PREEMPT > - and such architectures migth end up with the worst-cast latencies of > only scheduling at return to user space. The only thing these architectures should gain is the preempt counter itself, but yes the extra preemption points are not mandatory to have, i.e. we simply do not enable them for the nostalgia club. The removal of cond_resched() might cause latencies, but then I doubt that these museus pieces are used for real work :) Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um