From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: asm/page.h: zero out a pte's high value in set_pte_val()
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:32:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpqtgogb.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56AAB5ED.7020200@nod.at> (Richard Weinberger's message of "Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:44:29 +0100")
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> writes:
> Am 29.01.2016 um 00:56 schrieb Nicolai Stange:
>> Commit 16da306849d0 ("um: kill pfn_t")
>> introduced a compile warning for defconfig:
>>
>> arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c:38:206: warning: right shift count >= width of type
>> [-Wshift-count-overflow]
>>
>> Aforementioned patch changes the definition of the phys_to_pfn() macro from
>>
>> ((pfn_t) ((p) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
>>
>> to
>>
>> ((p) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>>
>> This effectively changes the phys_to_pfn() expansion's type from
>> unsigned long long to unsigned long.
>>
>> Through the callchain init_stub_pte()->mk_pte(), the expansion of
>> phys_to_pfn() is (indirectly) fed into the 'phys' argument of the
>> pte_set_val(pte, phys, prot) macro, eventually leading to
>>
>> (pte).pte_high = (phys) >> 32;
>>
>> This results in the warning from above.
>>
>> Since UML only deals with 32 bit addresses, the upper 32 bits from 'phys'
>> used to be zero anyway.
>>
>> Zero out the pte value's high part in pte_set_val() in order to get rid
>> of the offending shift.
>>
>> Fixes: 16da306849d0 ("um: kill pfn_t")
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/um/include/asm/page.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/page.h b/arch/um/include/asm/page.h
>> index e13d41c..61e235f 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/include/asm/page.h
>> +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/page.h
>> @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long pgd; } pgd_t;
>> smp_wmb(); \
>> (to).pte_low = (from).pte_low; })
>> #define pte_is_zero(pte) (!((pte).pte_low & ~_PAGE_NEWPAGE) && !(pte).pte_high)
>> -#define pte_set_val(pte, phys, prot) \
>> - ({ (pte).pte_high = (phys) >> 32; \
>> +#define pte_set_val(pte, phys, prot) \
>> + ({ (pte).pte_high = 0; \
>> (pte).pte_low = (phys) | pgprot_val(prot); })
>
> I think we can completely kill .pte_high.
>
I did a quick test with ->pte_high purged and this doesn't introduce any
new warnings.
Booting w/o a rootfs works up to mount_root.
Note that an implication of getting rid of ->pte_high would be that the
type of pte_val() would get changed from unsigned long long to unsigned
long. However, outside of arch/um, pte_val() is only used here:
- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vm.c
- include/trace/events/xen.h
- mm/gup.c
- mm/memory.c
All these uses and the ones in arch/um itself look compatible with this
change (if relevant at all for UML).
I'll post a follow up patch for this tomorrow.
Question 1: now that ->pte_high will be gone, do you want to have
->pte_low renamed to e.g. ->pte_val?
Question 2: what is the smp_wmb() in pte_copy() paired with/good for?
Thank you!
Nicolai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-29 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <871t91i7gf.fsf@gmail.com>
2016-01-29 0:44 ` [PATCH] um: asm/page.h: zero out a pte's high value in set_pte_val() Richard Weinberger
2016-01-29 1:32 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2016-01-29 8:47 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-01-29 14:31 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-31 9:11 ` [uml-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2016-01-31 15:09 ` [PATCH v2] um: asm/page.h: remove the pte_high member from struct pte_t Nicolai Stange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpqtgogb.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).