From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cb2ZK-0006fN-6z for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:01:18 -0800 Received: from bay24-f30.bay24.hotmail.com ([64.4.18.80] helo=hotmail.com) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Cb2ZG-0007W1-N8 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:01:16 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200412040452.32722.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> From: "Steve Schmidtke" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Subject: [uml-devel] RE: What to do with uml_switch? Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 20:00:51 +0000 To: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it, kraxel@bytesex.org, uml@uxu.ch, mcr@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Blaisorblade wrote: >It is apparent that something is wrong with uml_switch (though I don't know >the code and I'm not going to express technical opinion, only "management" >one). Yes, the fact that a core file has sat in the directory for almost 2 years says something. :) >Steve, merging at least the earlier of your patches (they are splitup The >Right Way(tm)) might be done soon, without lots of discussions. Thanks. I havn't noticed any problems with the changes I've made so far. >If you feel so, you might split uml_switch from the rest (but remember the >user point of view - two packages doubles the setup time). Who is this directed to? Who is the maintainer at the moment anyways? >If you are good guys (and you are), I think you can sort out by discussing >it >here (I'm just against the creation of a separate ML for that development - >things don't work that way). > >So, the ball is over to you. In this moment, Gerd Knorr seems the one who >has >the time and the position (working in SuSE) to manage it well (he can push >updates to its users and so on, for instance) but it's just my little 2 >cents. I'd be happy with Gerd as maintainer. I'd nominate myself, but I have no system that I can dedicate to the project. I also have a hard time saying no to interesting ideas. Steve Schmidtke ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel