From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-x343.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::343]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gCuZf-0007Qf-Hg for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 22:45:57 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x343.google.com with SMTP id q50so27931364otd.0 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:45:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181016235120.138227-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20181016235120.138227-7-brendanhiggins@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Brendan Higgins Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:45:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v1 06/31] arch: um: enabled running kunit from User Mode Linux List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tim.Bird@sony.com Cc: brakmo@fb.com, richard@nod.at, mpe@ellerman.id.au, Greg KH , jdike@addtoit.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Julia Lawall , mcgrof@kernel.org, Joel Stanley , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , joe@perches.com, shuah@kernel.org, khilman@baylibre.com, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM wrote: > > There are some > > other features we would like to add which would help with that goal as > > well like test isolation. We actually have a presubmit server > > internally for running KUnit tests that can usually respond to patches > > with test results within a couple minutes. Would something like that > > be interesting? > I think the code and architecture of the software that handles presubmit, > mail-list scanning, notifications, etc. would be of interest. But KUnit features > themselves (macro definitions, mocking vs. faking, etc.) would not. > I only say that in the context of CC-ing the automated testing list on the patch set. > Of course the KUnit features are interesting by themselves for testers doing > unit testing. Fair enough. Well, we will share what we have in that regard, but that belongs on a separate thread. BTW, what mailing list is that? I am also guessing your code isn't in the kernel repo; where is it? _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um