linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	 Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>,
	 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	 Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	 Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	 Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	netfs@lists.linux.dev,  ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org,  linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,  linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,  linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] VFS: introduce dentry_lookup_continue()
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:39:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjFPOZe004Cv+tT=NyQg2JOY6MOYQniSjaefVcg+3s-Kg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250812235228.3072318-5-neil@brown.name>

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:53 AM NeilBrown <neil@brown.name> wrote:
>
> A few callers operate on a dentry which they already have - unlike the
> normal case where a lookup proceeds an operation.
>
> For these callers dentry_lookup_continue() is provided where other
> callers would use dentry_lookup().  The call will fail if, after the
> lock was gained, the child is no longer a child of the given parent.
>
> There are a couple of callers that want to lock a dentry in whatever
> its current parent is.  For these a NULL parent can be passed, in which
> case ->d_parent is used.  In this case the call cannot fail.
>
> The idea behind the name is that the actual lookup occurred some time
> ago, and now we are continuing with an operation on the dentry.
>
> When the operation completes done_dentry_lookup() must be called.  An
> extra reference is taken when the dentry_lookup_continue() call succeeds
> and will be dropped by done_dentry_lookup().
>
> This will be used in smb/server, ecryptfs, and overlayfs, each of which
> have their own lock_parent() or parent_lock() or similar; and a few
> other places which lock the parent but don't check if the parent is
> still correct (often because rename isn't supported so parent cannot be
> incorrect).
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
> ---
>  fs/namei.c            | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/namei.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 7af9b464886a..df21b6fa5a0e 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -1874,6 +1874,45 @@ struct dentry *dentry_lookup_killable(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dentry_lookup_killable);
>
> +/**
> + * dentry_lookup_continue: lock a dentry if it is still in the given parent, prior to dir ops
> + * @child: the dentry to lock
> + * @parent: the dentry of the assumed parent
> + *
> + * The child is locked - currently by taking i_rwsem on the parent - to
> + * prepare for create/remove operations.  If the given parent is not
> + * %NULL and is no longer the parent of the dentry after the lock is
> + * gained, the lock is released and the call fails (returns
> + * ERR_PTR(-EINVAL).
> + *
> + * On success a reference to the child is taken and returned.  The lock
> + * and reference must both be dropped by done_dentry_lookup() after the
> + * operation completes.
> + */
> +struct dentry *dentry_lookup_continue(struct dentry *child,
> +                                     struct dentry *parent)
> +{
> +       struct dentry *p = parent;
> +
> +again:
> +       if (!parent)
> +               p = dget_parent(child);
> +       inode_lock_nested(d_inode(p), I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> +       if (child->d_parent != p) {

|| d_unhashed(child))

;)

and what about silly renames? are those also d_unhashed()?

Thanks,
Amir.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-12  2:25 [PATCH 00/11] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] VFS: discard err2 in filename_create() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  3:22   ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] VFS: introduce dentry_lookup() and friends NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:12   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  7:48     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] VFS: add dentry_lookup_killable() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:15   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  7:50     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 04/11] VFS: introduce dentry_lookup_continue() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:22   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  7:53     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-18 12:39   ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2025-08-18 21:52     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-19  8:37       ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 05/11] VFS: add rename_lookup() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:35   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  8:04     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-14  1:40       ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 06/11] VFS: unify old_mnt_idmap and new_mnt_idmap in renamedata NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:36   ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 07/11] VFS: Change vfs_mkdir() to unlock on failure NeilBrown
2025-08-13  7:22   ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-14  1:13     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-14 13:29       ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] VFS: allow d_splice_alias() and d_add() to work on hashed dentries NeilBrown
2025-08-13  5:07   ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] VFS: use global wait-queue table for d_alloc_parallel() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  6:44   ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  1:31     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] VFS: use d_alloc_parallel() in lookup_one_qstr_excl() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  5:19   ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  0:56     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] VFS: introduce d_alloc_noblock() and d_alloc_locked() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  6:53   ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  2:07     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-14 13:47       ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-13  0:01 ` [PATCH 00/11] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxjFPOZe004Cv+tT=NyQg2JOY6MOYQniSjaefVcg+3s-Kg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=code@tyhicks.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).