From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1De1le-00031v-32 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:18:38 -0700 Received: from mail.scgiservices.com ([198.107.3.67]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1De1lc-0008P6-1u for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:18:37 -0700 From: "Anthony Brock" Subject: RE: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:18:40 -0700 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, blaisorblade@yahoo.it Cc: jdike@addtoit.com The instance still hasn't crashed. However, I'm now seeing the following in the process table: # ps -eo user,pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,vsz,rss,tty,stat,start,time,cmd |grep -v grep |egrep 'PID|bindsec' |cut -b 1-131 USER PID PPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME CMD bindsec 12531 1 0.0 0.0 2676 1376 ? Ss 13:20:04 00:00:00 SCREEN -d -m -t bind2 -S bind2 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.1 bindsec 12532 12531 0.4 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 Ss+ 13:20:04 00:01:38 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12546 12532 0.0 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 S+ 13:20:04 00:00:01 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12547 12532 0.0 2.3 67516 49572 pts/1 S+ 13:20:04 00:00:00 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h bindsec 12548 12532 0.0 0.0 256 104 pts/1 T+ 13:20:04 00:00:00 bindsec 15460 12532 0.0 0.0 612 572 pts/1 T+ 13:20:48 00:00:00 0 ? A ??@ ? ? ? ? u3 bindsec 15465 12532 0.0 0.0 600 508 pts/1 T+ 13:20:48 00:00:00 ?@ ? ? ? ? .> ?@? A ??@ ? ? ? ? ) bindsec 15497 12532 0.0 0.0 1716 200 pts/1 T+ 13:20:49 00:00:00 0 ? ? ? ?) P @? A ? @ ? ? ? ? 8) bindsec 15528 12532 0.0 0.1 3816 3448 pts/1 T+ 13:20:49 00:00:04 ? ? ? ? R( ?(@? [ (@ bindsec 16592 12532 0.0 0.0 1380 164 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 ? ? ? ? I( ??? A A?@ ? ? ? ? .6 bindsec 16636 12532 0.0 0.0 1416 1416 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 bindsec 16638 12532 0.0 0.0 704 64 pts/1 T+ 13:21:06 00:00:00 ? ? ? ? ?< D?@? A a?@ ? ? ? ?< bindsec 17390 12532 0.0 0.0 488 488 pts/1 T+ 13:21:19 00:00:00 bindsec 21243 12532 0.0 0.0 1368 1368 pts/1 T+ 18:20:07 00:00:00 # Why do several of these processes have a process state of 'T+' (traced or stopped)? The instance seems to be responding normally. However, I'm VERY concerned about the new, extraneous processes. Any ideas? I'll try down-grading back to 2.6.11.11-bs5 to see if these still exist. Tony -----Original Message----- From: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Anthony Brock Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:06 AM To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; blaisorblade@yahoo.it Cc: jdike@addtoit.com Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 Blaisor, Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a backtrace. *sigh* Tony >>> Blaisorblade 05/31/05 04:32PM >>> On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:01, Anthony Brock wrote: > As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops > during compile: > > # make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um > CHK include/linux/version.h > UPD include/linux/version.h > SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um > > < output trimmed > > > SYMLINK arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c > CC arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o > CC arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o > CC arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o > AS arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o > CC arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o > fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory > make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2 > make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2 remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick glance. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=fad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel