From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cv26m-0000xU-VJ for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:34:28 -0800 Received: from mail.scgiservices.com ([198.107.3.67]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1Cv26l-0003Hk-BU for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:34:28 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.scgiservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD832881A for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.scgiservices.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01471-06 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:34:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from sterling (c-67-160-159-191.client.comcast.net [67.160.159.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.scgiservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B5528818 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:34:20 -0800 (PST) From: "Anthony Brock" Subject: RE: [uml-devel] 2.6.11-rc1 ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <200501211407.09896.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:34:56 -0800 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 21 January 2005 13:15, Gerd Knorr wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Anyone looked at 2.6.11-rc1 for the host? Some more ptrace cleanups >> happened there, and one of the changes conflicts with the sysemu code in >> the skas-v7 patch for 2.6.10. To me it's not clear how to solve that >> conflict as I'm not familier with the sysemu stuff and how these tree >> trace flags (syscall, sysemu, singlestep) play together ... > >> The conflicting changeset is attached below for reference. There are >> also some more ptrace changes (for singlestep) which might need fixups >> in sysemu. > >> Gerd > > I've already solved those conflict earlier on -rc1 (not tested) but I didn't > polish it out yet... if you are in a hurry, I can finish it and post the > result today on the ML. If not, I'll publish it later. Blaisor, Have you published your solution to the skas-v7 conflicts with the 2.6.11-rc1 kernel? Even better, I would like to try the 2.6.11-rc2 or 2.6.11-rc2-bk7 kernels as a skas-enabled host. Thanks! Tony ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel