From: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Fixing the 2.4 bugs - patches against 2.4.24-1um
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:51:02 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407071420550.9924@tuxrocks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407012050.14867.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, BlaisorBlade wrote:
> I've started working also on UML/2.4.
>
> Today I've split the changes between 2.4.24-1um and 2.4.24-2um into several
> patches; the HUMFS ones are carefully split out, but I've separated even the
> others. Now I need testers. Lots of people cannot use UML patches later than
> 2.4.24-1um, since they contain a lot of Hostfs bugs and some stability
> issues. Now, if you use just some patches, you'll avoid the bugs in the
> other.
>
> You should apply surely the first 3 patches, IMHO; the other ones should not
> hurt; inside txt/ there is a description of them.
<snip>
BlaisorBlade,
Thank you for splitting these patches out. Using them, I was able to
track down and squash a kernel panic issue I've had with all 2.4 patch
versions after 2.4.24-1um!
My panic, for reference -
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=108344473226217&w=2
In this case, the problem was actualy in the first 'mini-changes' patch,
and the fix (diff to the 2.4.24-2um patch):
--- uml-patch-2.4.24-2 2004-04-07 14:31:13.000000000 -0600
+++ uml-patch-2.4.24-2_frank 2004-07-07 14:26:49.000000000 -0600
@@ -35588,7 +35588,7 @@
+
+ARCH_CFLAGS = -U__$(SUBARCH)__ -U$(SUBARCH)
+
-+ifeq ($(CONFIG_GPROF),n)
++ifneq ($(CONFIG_GPROF),y)
+ARCH_CFLAGS += -DUM_FASTCALL
+endif
+
The configuration program will either set CONFIG_GPROF to 'y', or it will
put "# CONFIG_GPROF is not set" into the .config file. CONFIG_GPROF will
never be 'n', at least in my understanding.
I believe this bug may affect stability for a number of people, and it has
existed since 2.4.24-2um first came out. It may not solve any underlying
problems, but I'd like to hear if it helps anyone else.
Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK
Systems Manager, Computer Science Department
Brigham Young University
frank@tuxrocks.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 18:50 [uml-devel] Fixing the 2.4 bugs - patches against 2.4.24-1um BlaisorBlade
2004-07-07 20:51 ` Frank Sorenson [this message]
2004-07-08 16:38 ` [uml-user] " BlaisorBlade
2004-07-09 19:55 ` Frank Sorenson
2004-07-13 19:34 ` Jeff Dike
2004-07-15 15:39 ` Frank Sorenson
2004-07-21 17:27 ` [uml-devel] Fixing the 2.4 bugs - patches against 2.4.24-1um - new ones BlaisorBlade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0407071420550.9924@tuxrocks.com \
--to=frank@tuxrocks.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox