From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmBjb-0002rK-Fm for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:38:47 -0700 Received: from arachne.taloncorporation.com ([208.176.116.10]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1FmBjZ-0000af-4k for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:38:47 -0700 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 11:38:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven James In-Reply-To: <20060602151335.GA4708@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Message-ID: References: <20060526032424.GA8283@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200605261236.26814.ak@suse.de> <20060526141345.GA4152@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200606012107.34676.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20060602151335.GA4708@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64 List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jeff Dike Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Blaisorblade , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roland McGrath On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 09:07:33PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: >> Sorry for the question, but has this been sent to -stable (since it's a >> -stable regression, it should be)? To 2.6.17 -git? > > It's in current git. > > I'm having a hard time telling when the bug was introduced. The git web > interface seems to be telling me that the double notification was around > since last year, which I don't believe, since I've run much more > recent x86_64 kernels. If the bug existed before 2.6.16, then it's > fine -stable fodder. I know that the bug is NOT present in 2.6.15.7. > >> And have you tested it (somebody should have, but it's not sure)? > > Yes, it's been continuously and happily running UML since Andi sent me > his patch. > > Jeff > _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel