From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjrKC-0003Dp-3y for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:03:44 -0700 Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IjrKA-0007wi-L6 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:03:44 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:01:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" In-Reply-To: <20071022065202.GI2998@hacking> Message-ID: References: <200710200252.37919.p.giarrusso@gmail.com> <87y7dyhv2u.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20071021114854.GF2455@hacking> <20071021130848.GA4621@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20071021132031.GI2455@hacking> <20071021154346.GW8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022043746.GF2998@hacking> <20071022052214.GY8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022061245.GG2998@hacking> <87d4v7fy5i.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20071022065202.GI2998@hacking> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final. List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: WANG Cong Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike , Paolo Giarrusso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nix , Rob Landley , Al Viro On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:42:33AM +0100, Nix wrote: > >On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following: > >> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;( > >> > >> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here: > >> http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt > > > >It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results > >I'd expect if you had run make {old,menu,x}config without specifying > >ARCH=um, so you've configured for one architecture and are now trying > >to build another. > > > >Where is the include/asm symlink pointing to in your build tree? > > $ ls -l include/asm > lrwxrwxrwx 1 wangcong wangcong 6 2007-10-22 12:34 include/asm -> asm-um > > OK. Let me do the following: > > $ make mrproper ... if you wanted to be *really* anal retentive, you might want to run "make distclean" instead but, from what i've seen so far, i don't think that would change what you're seeing. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel