From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bp@alien8.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:59:16 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] x86: use fallback for random_get_entropy()
 instead of zero
Message-ID: <Yl8GhNjwPLNiUfSZ@zn.tnic>
References: <20220419111650.1582274-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20220419111650.1582274-8-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <Yl78gLLcSb3EHv0B@zn.tnic>
 <CAHmME9q03Je-ROzzHCgZC0vy1n=y8bsGBOAs8U_K_r3ebLNHbw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9q03Je-ROzzHCgZC0vy1n=y8bsGBOAs8U_K_r3ebLNHbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>, "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
List-ID: <linux-um.lists.infradead.org>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I think I prefer doing (a), and leaving (b) for another time when you
> or another x86 maintainer can do so. But I'll do whichever you say.
> Which would you like?

We are switching all feature checks to cpu_feature_enabled() so you
might as well do the new preferred way of checking when adding a
new function and so that we have one less place to touch. Which is
appreciated. :)

Thx!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette