From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F04C2BD09 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 04:54:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=/fzE2yWElnzU7XRficmyE9tfka6WnF3hLS24PJakxl4=; b=veNAzTPC9VKctH+RWwJl6+BQ7k L/BQX+IR7n6q3XsEN9u3Fle0cJILFzsAqO6f9eLBhxsVL/S6Q5lEjvxx9NnTgY6H0O1piVbjGnAAe i8xtPWFaK0N24fM4reNjU0Sg6dV7VWKbgFGsYmsS9qM7tGkCJIbkrNIV3xkJl1NPUJC49nGAvqp3O 0G3dwIOxvIgKChsh/gvwcYqrCimyicAAVaQlRkZ3+2gpcXDlyiA3C7wDt+Nyh6cUxHZwlKToVHBWX ePwUlKqbRhpQZs0bnGCGW/dsbFqjB4OLj3vIO0GetCh5umv6Odbn+p7uwGs5HA2FqKWNqGvzaUEtd kpVqDZYA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sMh97-00000009D95-19wI; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 04:54:09 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sMh93-00000009D8d-4Br2; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 04:54:06 +0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:54:05 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Oliver Sang Cc: Christoph Hellwig , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Jens Axboe , Ulf Hansson , Damien Le Moal , Hannes Reinecke , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, nbd@other.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement Message-ID: References: <202406250948.e0044f1d-oliver.sang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-um@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+linux-um=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:35:38AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > > I failed to apply patch in your previous reply to 1122c0c1cc or current tip > of axboe-block/for-next: > c1440ed442a58 (axboe-block/for-next) Merge branch 'for-6.11/block' into for-next That already includes it. > > but it's ok to apply upon next: > * 0fc4bfab2cd45 (tag: next-20240625) Add linux-next specific files for 20240625 > > I've already started the test based on this applyment. > is the expectation that patch should not introduce performance change comparing > to 0fc4bfab2cd45? > > or if this applyment is not ok, please just give me guidance. Thanks! The expectation is that the latest block branch (and thus linux-next) doesn't see this performance change.